Scott Geels, et al. v. Desiree Morrow, et al.
── Scott Geels, et al. v. Desiree Morrow, et al. ──
Case No.: 21A-MI-00960
Court: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date: April 27, 2022
Author: Judge Melissa May
County of Origin: Allen
Category: Civil
Decision: Rehearing
Judge Brown and Judge Pyle concur
[1]
Scott Geels and Erica Leitch (“Appellants”) request rehearing, arguing this
court “incorrectly decid[ed] the matter on an issue not raised by Appellants”
and “fail[ed] to rule on the issue presented by Appellants[.]” (Appellants’ Reh.
Br. at 5) (internal formatting omitted). Appellants point to our use of the word
“guardianship” to indicate the type of proceeding appealed, see, e.g., Geels v.
Morrow, 182 N.E.3d 237, 239 (Ind. Ct. App.
← Back to Melissa May's profile
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}