NIPSCO Industrial Group v. Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor, et al.
── NIPSCO Industrial Group v. Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor, et al. ──
Case No.: 24A-EX-02834
Court: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date: September 30, 2025
Author: Judge Stephen Scheele
Category: Other
Decision: Affirmed
Judge Foley and Judge Kenworthy concur
I. Background: TDSIC Plans Generally
Our Supreme Court has previously discussed the processes under which utility
rates are set and adjusted. See NIPSCO Indus. Grp. v. N. Ind. Pub. Serv. Co.
(NIPSCO 2018), 100 N.E.3d 234, 238-39 (Ind. 2018), modified on reh’g.; see also
NIPSCO Indus. Grp. v. N. Ind. Pub. Serv. Co. (NIPSCO 2019), 125 N.E.3d 617,
619-21 (Ind. 2019), reh’g. denied.
← Back to Stephen Scheele's profile
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}