Adrian Cardenas v. Hook-Superx, L.L.C. d/b/a CVS Pharmacy, et al.

── Adrian Cardenas v. Hook-Superx, L.L.C. d/b/a CVS Pharmacy, et al. ── Case No.: 24A-CT-01942 Court: Indiana Court of Appeals Date: January 13, 2025 Author: Judge Paul Mathias County of Origin: Marion Category: Civil Decision: Reversed and Remanded Judge Kenworthy concurs. Judge Brown dissents In the fall of 2018, CVS entered into a Service Agreement with Single Source Security, d/b/a Protos Security (“Protos”). Pursuant to that agreement, Protos was “to perform management of security guard services” at various CVS locations upon CVS’s request. Appellant’s App. Vol. 2, p. 71.1 The Service 1 The cover page of volume 2 of the Appellant’s Appendix misidentifies it as volume 1. Agreement permitted Protos to use “its own employees and/or . . . subcontractors” to provide those services. Id.