to what you're going to request in 2026, you're going to go down, it's $2,000,000. If you count the salary in the benefits, now I don't think the benefits themselves are in my, they're not in my budget line, they would be in the commissioners' budget line. But between salary and benefits, yes, it's going to go down to $2,000,000, $1,000,000, plus dollars. I mean, that's a big community that we're totally trying to find, 1.8 million, and we can find a few out of 1,000 in time. I think that speaks volumes. But if we are having a large, large parking, there's a very few places we can find it in, you know, right? Yeah, no, I understand. Well, I mean, not really. In reality, we're, you know, just our department's close to a million in the last 11 months that we've, so. Well, I got a question for you, that, and I asked you in your last time when we were going through, and then I got a question for Katie. But when we went through and done that, it's even pretty much she, if permission is given to how, at least, one more deputy, then the dispatchers and jailers kind of insect them. Then what? Because I was a little shocked when... Yeah, it was in the commission? The information's given in 1.1. Brad, Brad, if you really don't think this, really Brad would, you wouldn't do the two marts. Yeah, so chief deputy, why don't you tell me that? And I think, I mean, and I'm not, I'm not here to argue or whatever. But I feel like, based on everybody I've talked to, I feel like Amy, that's right, understood. What was being said, and asked there, you know, I clearly asked for two you married, but these last go around. And what you're saying is, if permission is given to how, at least one married deputy, then we have a second dispatch of me. So in other words, I asked for two married deputies. And then, if you were to say zero, then I wouldn't have to ask for dispatch. But since you agreed, I think Brad was my question, because in the commissioners, I didn't ask. I didn't ask that. We give you one married deputy, we give you two jailers, and we give you two dispatchers. No. We give you five hires. And that's just something that's bothered me ever since that. But then, hold that thought, because I'm not sure a question. This came in last time. Correct me if I'm wrong. But this came in, they requested two hires, married deputies. It was very narrow. It's back in the same form. I mean, we have a true order, and then have to change forms. I mean, if it's renewing, it's request. I mean, if there's additional order, and it doesn't have... I thought if that didn't go in there, I'm not going to change form. I don't get the forms and how it's committed, or whatever, but I mean, if it's renewing, it's request. I mean, if there's been a change in circumstances, you can renew it. On the same, I was thinking that it had to change forms, or it had, maybe I'm wrong. I think it can come back at the next meeting, because this... It was very narrowed had to change form. I believe it just cannot come back up in the same form in the same meeting. So, what you're saying is, he requested two marriage deputies the last time, and it was voted down. Correct. And then to this meeting, he submitted the same form to request the two marriage deputies. So, what he's telling you today is when I understand, correctly, if I'm wrong, that he felt there was a miscommunication, he's providing you with additional information, and that there's been a change in circumstances due to safety issues, other things like that. He can bring it again if there's a change in circumstances. There's been absolutely no change, and it's just because he doesn't like to learn, no, and you are correct. If there's been a change, in between those two meetings, he can bring back in and act. This is according to Robert Strohl, or if we're supposed to continue to make the same request or a motion, and next meeting, even if it was previously defeated, this process is known as renewing the motion. There's some conditions, but we're doing this due to this, the motion is completed, prior meeting, or reconsideration, and we need that. It's from our dollar. It's good. All right. I'll try to do something there, but I want to show you a little bit.
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}