United States v. Catherine Chollet
── United States v. Catherine Chollet ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date: June 09, 2026
Category: General
USCA4 Appeal: 24-4634 Doc: 112 Filed: 06/09/2026 Pg: 1 of 24
PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-4634
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CATHERINE ELIZABETH CHOLLET, a/k/a Liza Chollet,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 24-4635
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL ELLIOT KOHN,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 24-4636
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID SHANE SIMMONS, a/k/a Shane Simmons,
Defendant - Appellant.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-4634 Doc: 112 Filed: 06/09/2026 Pg: 2 of 24
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Statesville. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (5:22-cr-00060-KDB-SCR-2; 5:22-cr-
00060-KDB-SCR-1; 5:22-cr-00060-KDB-SCR-3)
Argued: May 6, 2026 Decided: June 9, 2026
Amended: June 9, 2026
Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Niemeyer wrote the opinion, in which Judge
Thacker and Judge Rushing joined.
ARGUED: Justin Gelfand, MARGULIS GELFAND LLC, St. Louis, Missouri; Karl
Walter Dickhaus, DICKHAUS LAW PARTNERSHIP, L.P., St. Louis, Missouri, for
Appellants. Todd Alan Ellinwood, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Richard Lamb Brown, Jr., LAW OFFICES
OF RICHARD BROWN, Monroe, North Carolina, for Appellant David Simmons. A.
Tysen Duva, Assistant Attorney General, Jennifer Hodge, Deputy Assistant Attorney
General, S. Robert Lyons, Katie Bagley, Joseph B. Syverson, Tax Section, Criminal
Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Russ
Ferguson, United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
2
USCA4 Appeal: 24-4634 Doc: 112 Filed: 06/09/2026 Pg: 3 of 24
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:
Michael Kohn, Catherine Chollet, and David Simmons were convicted of
conspiracy to defraud the government and assisting in the preparation of false and
fraudulent tax returns. On appeal of their judgments, they raise numerous issues
challenging their convictions, including claims that the government violated the
Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution in prosecuting the crimes; that venue in the
Western District of North Carolina was improper; that the tax returns were technically true,
as the calculations followed the tax forms; and that the district court made erroneous
evidentiary rulings, among other challenges.
For the reasons given herein, we reject the defendants’ challenges and affirm.
I
Michael Kohn and his daughter Catherine Chollet were tax attorneys and partners
in The Kohn Partnership, LLP, a law firm in St. Louis, Missouri. David Simmons was an
insurance broker residing in Jefferson, North Carolina, who worked closely with Kohn,
Chollet, and The Kohn Partnership in assisting in the preparation of income tax returns on
behalf of clients in various states, including North Carolina.
Years ago, th
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}