All States › Evidence
Neutral Court Opinion Jun 11, 2026

Willian Solis Godoy v. Attorney General United States of America

── Willian Solis Godoy v. Attorney General United States of America ── Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Date: June 09, 2026 Category: General CLD-140 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 25-3424 ___________ WILLIAN EFREN SOLIS GODOY, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ____________________________________ On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Agency No. A246-157-397) Immigration Judge: Kuyomars Golparvar ____________________________________ Submitted on Respondent’s Motion for Summary Disposition Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 May 28, 2026 Before: BIBAS, PHIPPS, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: June 9, 2026) ___________ OPINION * ___________ PER CURIAM Willian Efren Solis Godoy, proceeding pro se, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s * This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. (IJ) denial of his application for relief and protection from removal. The Government has filed a motion for summary disposition, arguing that Solis Godoy’s petition presents no substantial question. We agree, and we will therefore grant the Government’s motion and summarily deny Solis Godoy’s petition for review. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 27.4; 3d Cir. I.O.P. 10.6. Solis Godoy, a citizen of Ecuador, fled his country because he feared persecution from the “Los Tiguerones” gang and entered the United States on or about November 21, 2022. Solis Godoy applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). On October 8, 2025, at Solis Godoy’s merits hearing, the IJ denied all relief. Solis Godoy’s appeal of the IJ’s decision was due to be filed directly with the BIA by November 7, 2025, 8 C.F.R. § 1003.38(b), but the BIA did not receive it until November 10, 2025. On November 13, 2025, Solis Godoy filed a motion asking the BIA to accept his notice of appeal as timely. In his motion, Solis Godoy explained that he had been diligently working to prepare his appeal, first by seeking an attorney, and then by completing the paperwork himself. Solis Godoy explained that, because he is detained, he needed a friend to assist him with gathering the appropriate paperwork. When his friend brought his papers to the detention center, however, she was not permitted to bring them inside, delaying his ability to sign the documents. With the assistance of a case manager at the facility, Solis Godoy was able to complete and sign all required documents on November 6, 2025—one day before the appeal was due. Solis Godoy’s friend sent the appeal the same day by overnight delivery, and it was scheduled to arrive on November 7, 2025. Because of unforeseen flight 2 delays, however, the notice of appeal was delivered on November 10, 2025. Solis Godoy asked the BIA to equitably toll the filing deadline so that his notice of appeal would be timely, or in the alternative, to accept the notice by certification pursuant to its authority under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(c). On December 3, 2025, the BIA rejected these arguments and summarily dismissed Solis Godoy’s appeal as untimely, pursua
CourtListener · Jun 09, 2026
Original link
Share on X Share on Facebook
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own address as its source and its own type. #}