All States › Evidence
Neutral Court Opinion Jun 10, 2026

Alabama State Conference of the NAACP v. Secretary of State for the State of Alabama

── Alabama State Conference of the NAACP v. Secretary of State for the State of Alabama ── Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Date: June 08, 2026 Category: CON USCA11 Case: 25-13007 Document: 86-1 Date Filed: 06/08/2026 Page: 1 of 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-13007 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ ALABAMA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, GREATER BIRMINGHAM MINISTRIES, EVAN MILLIGAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, LAQUISHA CHANDLER, et al., Plaintiffs, versus SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA, Defendant-Appellant, STEVE LIVINGSTON, in his official capacity as Co-Chair of the Alabama Permanent Legislative Committee on Reapportionment et al., Defendants. USCA11 Case: 25-13007 Document: 86-1 Date Filed: 06/08/2026 Page: 2 of 4 2 Opinion of the Court 25-13007 ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:21-cv-01531-AMM ____________________ ____________________ No. 25-14131 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ ALABAMA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, GREATER BIRMINGHAM MINISTRIES, EVAN MILLIGAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, LAQUISHA CHANDLER, et al., Plaintiffs, versus SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA, Defendant-Appellant, STEVE LIVINGSTON, in his official capacity as Co-Chair of the Alabama Permanent Legislative Committee on Reapportionment, et al., Defendants. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:21-cv-01531-AMM ____________________ Before BRANCH, LUCK, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: USCA11 Case: 25-13007 Document: 86-1 Date Filed: 06/08/2026 Page: 3 of 4 25-13007 Opinion of the Court 3 These appeals arise out of the district court’s entry of two injunctions under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (“VRA”). The Supreme Court, in the past few weeks, has vacated several district court injunctions entered under the VRA, and has remanded those cases for reconsideration in light of Louisiana v. Callais, 146 S. Ct. 1131 (2026). See Allen v. Caster, No. 25-243, 2026 WL 1282800, at *1 (U.S. May 11, 2026); Bd. of Election Comm’rs v. NAACP, No. 25-234, 2026 WL 1377105, at *1 (U.S. May 18, 2026); Turtle Mountain Band v. Howe, No. 25-253, 2026 WL 1377069, at *1 (U.S. May 18, 2026); see also Allen v. Milligan, No. 25A1315, 2026 WL 1552756, at *1–2 (U.S. Jun. 2, 2026). We stayed the district court’s injunctions in these cases on May 28, 2026, concluding that Wes Allen, the Secre- tary of State of Alabama, had made a strong showing that we would, “as the Supreme Court has done,” v
CourtListener · Jun 08, 2026
Original link
Share on X Share on Facebook
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own address as its source and its own type. #}