All States › Evidence
Neutral Court Opinion Jun 10, 2026

Ali Abdulsamad v. Director, Georgia Bureau of Investigation

── Ali Abdulsamad v. Director, Georgia Bureau of Investigation ── Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Date: June 09, 2026 Category: NEW USCA11 Case: 25-14071 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 06/09/2026 Page: 1 of 11 NOT FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-14071 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ ALI ABDULSAMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus DIRECTOR, GEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, SERGEANT GILBERTO LORENZO, Supervisor, Internal Affairs, Gwinnett County Police Department, DETECTIVE JOHN MUTCH, Gwinnett County Police Department, SERGEANT MARSHALL, Internal Affairs, DeKalb County Police Department, DETECTIVE HAMMER, DeKalb County Police Department, et al., Defendants-Appellees, CHIEF, GWINNETT COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. USCA11 Case: 25-14071 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 06/09/2026 Page: 2 of 11 2 Opinion of the Court 25-14071 ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:25-cv-04223-LMM ____________________ Before JORDAN, BRASHER, and KIDD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Ali Abdulsamad, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his first amended complaint as a shotgun pleading. He argues that the district court (1) abused its discretion by dismissing his complaint and disregarding his evi- dence of unauthorized surveillance, (2) penalized him for comply- ing with its order to replead, (3) erred in concluding that amend- ment would be futile, and (4) failed to liberally construe his pro se filings. He also argues that cumulative errors and bias warrant re- assignment to a different district judge. After careful review, we af- firm. Separately, Abdulsamad has moved to supplement the rec- ord and for the Court to take judicial notice or order in camera re- view of an FBI document. We deny his motion. I. This case arises from Abdulsamad’s allegations of unlawful surveillance and harassment by an ex-girlfriend. Abdulsamad al- leges that his ex-girlfriend is a senior CIA official who lives in Ger- many and coordinated with others to plant surveillance cameras in his Georgia home. She allegedly has used her surveillance of him USCA11 Case: 25-14071 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 06/09/2026 Page: 3 of 11 25-14071 Opinion of the Court 3 to conspire with others to break into his car, tow his car, hit his car, make discriminatory remarks to him while he is driving for Uber, publish private details of his life on social media, steal skincare cream from his mailbox, tamper with his hair treatment medica- tion, hack his Uber account, hack his phone, and suspend his license under the designation “Super Speeder” even though he had paid his speeding ticket. Abdulsamad has also sued various law enforcement officers at the local, state, and federal level, alleging that they have been conspiring with his ex-girlfriend to harass him. The alleged harass- ment includes stopping him for immigration intervie
CourtListener · Jun 09, 2026
Original link
Share on X Share on Facebook
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own address as its source and its own type. #}