United States v. Rodriguez-Reyes
── United States v. Rodriguez-Reyes ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date: June 10, 2026
Category: General
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 23-2037
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,
v.
JERRY OMAR RODRÍGUEZ-REYES, a/k/a Quiri,
Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Barron, Chief Judge,
Thompson and Aframe, Circuit Judges.
María S. Ramírez-Becerra for appellant.
Jeniffer Vélez-Pérez, with whom W. Stephen Muldrow, United
States Attorney; Mariana E. Bauzá-Almonte, Assistant United States
Attorney, Chief, Appellate Division; and Thomas F. Klumper,
Assistant United States Attorney, Senior Appellate Counsel, were
on brief, for appellee.
June 10, 2026
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Thirteen years after we first
upheld Jerry Omar Rodríguez-Reyes's life sentence following jury
convictions arising from his leadership in a murderous
drug-dealing conspiracy, see United States v. Rodríguez-Reyes
(Rodríguez I), 714 F.3d 1, 17 (1st Cir. 2013), he's before us
again. This time, Rodríguez (whose name we shorten based on
Spanish naming customs) appeals the district court's denial of his
motion to reduce his sentence under the First Step Act. As we'll
explain shortly, we affirm.
I
It all started more than twenty years ago at La Recta,
a section of San Juan's Nemesio R. Canales public housing project.1
Rodríguez I, 714 F.3d at 4. Local kingpin Melvin Méndez-Roldán
ran the crack cocaine business there, and he "charged a monthly
rent to other drug owners who wanted to sell marijuana" at that
same spot. Id. (cleaned up). And while Méndez (who "regularly
patrolled La Recta with firearms" and "frequently used violence,
including lethal violence" to maintain control of his fiefdom) was
arrested in 2003, he still ran the show from his prison cell for
a while. Id. at 4-5.
1 We set the stage with the facts and history from our first
opinion on Rodríguez, which itself draws from a jury verdict we
upheld as evidentiarily sufficient. See Rodríguez I, 714 F.3d at
8.
- 2 -
Enter stage left Rodríguez. In 2004, he began selling
marijuana (about a pound every couple of days) throughout La Recta
and carrying a gun while he did so. Id. at 5. And after Méndez's
arrest, Rodríguez and some fellow dealers sought to protect and
even expand their business, largely through violence. Id.
That campaign culminated in two especially disturbing
events. First was a drive-by-shooting where Rodríguez (alongside
four others) took a stolen SUV and some heavy-duty guns (like
AK-47s) to a rival dealer's spot and opened fire -- killing three
people. Id. Second was the cold-blooded murder of another drug
dealer, Agustín. Id. at 5-6. One day, after a compatriot of
Rodríguez (Héctor González-Suárez) greeted Agustín with an
embrace, Rodríguez shot Agustín in the back of the head. Id. at
6. Rodríguez and González continued to shoot Agustín once he hit
the ground, and he succumbed to the gunshot wounds. Id.
For these acts (and others), Rodríguez was arrested and
charged with several crimes. Id. We'll spare the finer procedural
details and just say that a jury ultimately convicted him and other
dealers (including Méndez and González) of two charges. Id. Count
One was conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute both
marijuana and over 50 grams of crack cocaine (contra 21 U.S.C.
§§ 841 and 860), and Count Two was conspiracy to possess and use
(among other ver
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}