United States v. Knight
── United States v. Knight ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date: June 08, 2026
Category: Direct Criminal
Case: 25-30633 Document: 56-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/08/2026
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
____________ United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 25-30633
FILED
June 8, 2026
Summary Calendar
____________ Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Brian O. Knight,
Defendant—Appellant.
______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
USDC No. 3:25-CR-14-1
______________________________
Before Higginbotham, Engelhardt, and Ramirez, Circuit
Judges.
Per Curiam: *
Brian O. Knight challenges the substantive reasonableness of the 15-
month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for possession
of a firearm by a convicted felon. He first argues that the district court gave
significant weight to an improper factor, his need for rehabilitation, in
violation of Tapia v. United States, 564 U.S. 319, 332-34 (2011). Because he
_____________________
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 25-30633 Document: 56-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/08/2026
No. 25-30633
did not raise this specific argument in the district court, we review it for plain
error. See United States v. Zarco-Beiza, 24 F.4th 477, 481-82 (5th Cir. 2022).
The court’s statements regarding rehabilitation and Knight’s alcohol abuse,
viewed in context, did not clearly or obviously violate Tapia. Thus, Knight
has not demonstrated reversible plain error. See Puckett v. United States, 556
U.S. 129, 135 (2009).
Knight also contends the district court failed to give sufficient weight
to his post-incarceration rehabilitation and gave too much weight to his
dangerousness based on unrelated charges. The district court thoroughly
considered Knight’s history and his arguments for a lesser sentence but
concluded that a within-guidelines sentence was appropriate in light of the 18
U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. Knight fails to show any abuse of discretion. See
United States v. Castillo-Rubio, 34 F.4th 404, 411 (5th Cir. 2022).
AFFIRMED.
2
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}