United States v. Maldonado-Maldonado
── United States v. Maldonado-Maldonado ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date: June 08, 2026
Category: General
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 25-1607
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
HÉCTOR MALDONADO-MALDONADO,
Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. María Antongiorgi-Jordán, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Barron, Chief Judge,
Lipez and Rikelman, Circuit Judges.
José David Rodríguez, Assistant Federal Public Defender, with
whom Rachel Brill, Federal Public Defender, and Franco L.
Pérez-Redondo, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Supervisor,
Appellate Unit, were on brief, for appellant.
Maarja T. Luhtaru, with whom W. Stephen Muldrow, United States
Attorney, Juan Carlos Reyes-Ramos, Assistant United States
Attorney, Chief, Appellate Division, and Julia M. Meconiates,
Assistant United States Attorney, were on brief, for appellee.
June 8, 2026
RIKELMAN, Circuit Judge. For the second time, Héctor
Maldonado-Maldonado ("Maldonado") appeals his sentence for
assaulting a corrections officer. He lodges several procedural
challenges to his revised sentence. We agree with Maldonado that
the district court legally erred when it relied on information
outside the record, without any notice to him, in determining his
sentence. Thus, we vacate the judgment and remand for
resentencing.
I. BACKGROUND1
A. Relevant Facts
In August 2020, while he was incarcerated at the
Metropolitan Detention Center in Guaynabo, Maldonado assaulted a
senior corrections officer (SCO). See United States v.
Maldonado-Maldonado (Maldonado I), 134 F.4th 32, 33-34 (1st Cir.
2025). During the assault, Maldonado punched the SCO multiple
times and placed him in a headlock, all with the help of his
cellmate, Miguel Santana-Aviles ("Santana"). See id. at 34. The
SCO suffered injuries to his head and neck and experienced
headaches for months after the attack. See id. A grand jury
eventually charged both Maldonado and Santana with assaulting,
1Because this appeal follows a guilty plea, we draw the
relevant facts from the plea agreement, the unobjected-to portions
of the Presentence Investigation Report, and the transcript of the
sentencing hearing. See United States v. Colón-Cordero, 91 F.4th
41, 45 (1st Cir. 2024).
- 2 -
resisting, or impeding a federal officer. See 18 U.S.C.
§ 111(a)(1), (b).
B. Procedural History
1. The Initial Sentencing and Appeal
Although Santana proceeded to trial, Maldonado
eventually pleaded guilty to the charge against him. See
Maldonado I, 134 F.4th at 34. As part of his plea deal, Maldonado
and the government agreed to propose to the district court a
sentencing calculation that hinged on applying the "[o]bstructing
or [i]mpeding [o]fficers" guideline in the United States
Sentencing Guidelines. See U.S. Sent'g Guidelines Manual
("U.S.S.G.") § 2A2.4 (U.S. Sent'g Comm'n 2021).2 Given Maldonado's
criminal history category and various adjustments, the agreed-upon
calculation would have yielded a sentencing range of 18 to 24
months in prison.
Separately, the U.S. Probation Office submitted a
Presentence Investigation Repo
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}