State v. Hughes
── State v. Hughes ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Kansas
Date: June 05, 2026
Category: General
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
No. 129,016
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS
STATE OF KANSAS,
Appellee,
v.
TREVOR LEE CARL HUGHES,
Appellant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appeal from Shawnee District Court; CHERYL A. RIOS, judge. Submitted without oral argument.
Opinion filed June 5, 2026. Affirmed in part and remanded with directions.
Corrine E. Gunning, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, for appellant.
Carolyn A. Smith, assistant deputy district attorney, Mike Kagay, district attorney, and Kris W.
Kobach, attorney general, for appellee.
Before BRUNS, P.J., SCHROEDER and GARDNER, JJ.
PER CURIAM: Trevor Lee Carl Hughes timely appeals the revocation of his
probation, claiming the district court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his probation because
it revoked solely on grounds alleged in the State's amended motion to revoke probation
filed after his original term of probation had expired. Hughes also argues he is entitled to
additional jail credit. After a thorough review of the record, we find the district court
properly exercised its discretion to revoke Hughes' probation. But we find we must
remand for the district court to determine what jail credit, if any, he is entitled to, given
1
the recent decisions from our Supreme Court. Therefore, we affirm in part and remand
for the district court to calculate any jail credit to which Hughes may be entitled.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Hughes pled guilty to one count each of arson and burglary for acts committed in
May 2020. In February 2022, the district court sentenced Hughes to a total prison term of
49 months' imprisonment but granted a dispositional departure to 24 months' probation.
Hughes' probation did not proceed as the court hoped for. In July 2022, the State
filed a motion for an order to show cause why probation should not be revoked for failure
to report and failure to provide a current address. The district court issued a warrant a few
days later. In December 2022, Hughes was taken into custody in Johnson County, where
he pled guilty to a new crime of aggravated battery. Hughes remained in custody until
February 2025.
While in custody in Johnson County, Hughes filed a request for disposition of
detainer in this case requesting the State either dismiss the probation revocation or
proceed to a hearing. Shortly after Hughes requested a disposition of detainer, the
probation violation warrant was executed, and the State filed an amended motion to
revoke probation alleging Hughes failed to report, failed to provide a current address, and
committed a new crime.
On May 2, 2024, the district court held a show cause hearing in which Hughes
withdrew his request for disposition of detainer and asked the district court to allow him
to serve his Johnson County sentence before addressing the probation violations. The
district court allowed Hughes to withdraw his motion and ultimately held a show cause
hearing on the probation violations in March 2025.
2
At the show cause hearing, Hughes' intensive supervision officer (ISO) testified
that Hughes failed to report in June 2022 and could not be found. Hughes' ISO did not
know about the new crime in Johnson County until searching a database looking for
Hughes. Hughes also testified and admitted he had stopped reporting to probation and
committed a new crime of aggravated battery.
The district court revoked Hughes' probation and imposed his underlying prison
sentence of 49 months. The district court explain
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}