Devante Shakur Foster v. State of Indiana
── Devante Shakur Foster v. State of Indiana ──
Court: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date: May 29, 2026
Author: Mary DeBoer
Category: General
FILED
May 29 2026, 9:22 am
CLERK
Indiana Supreme Court
Court of Appeals
and Tax Court
IN THE
Court of Appeals of Indiana
Devante Shakur Foster,
Appellant-Defendant
v.
State of Indiana,
Appellee-Plaintiff
May 29, 2026
Court of Appeals Case No.
25A-CR-325
Appeal from the Marion Superior Court
The Honorable Angela Dow Davis, Judge
Trial Court Cause No.
49D27-2112-F3-38841
Opinion by Chief Judge Tavitas
Judges Kenworthy and DeBoer concur.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 25A-CR-325 | May 29, 2026 Page 1 of 29
Tavitas, Chief Judge.
Case Summary
[1] Following a three-day jury trial, Devante Foster was convicted of two counts of
armed robbery, Level 3 felonies; kidnapping, a Level 3 felony; criminal
confinement, a Level 3 felony; and theft, a Level 5 felony, arising from the
armed robberies of two armored vehicles on December 15 and 16, 2021. Foster
appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. 1
Issues
[2] Foster raises four issues, 2 which we consolidate and restate as three dispositive
issues:
I. Whether the State’s remarks during closing argument
constituted prosecutorial misconduct that resulted in
fundamental error.
II. Whether the trial court violated Foster’s constitutional
rights to present a defense and to confront his accuser by
limiting his cross-examination of a witness.
1
We held oral argument in this matter on April 28, 2026, at the Indiana Historical Society. We thank the
Indiana Historical Society for its hospitality and counsel for their presentations.
2
We need not address Foster’s sufficiency-of-the-evidence argument regarding the kidnapping conviction
because we vacate that conviction on substantive double jeopardy grounds.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 25A-CR-325 | May 29, 2026 Page 2 of 29
III. Whether Foster’s convictions for theft, kidnapping,
criminal confinement, and armed robbery violate the
substantive bar to double jeopardy.
Facts
[3] On December 15, 2021, Domonique Wilson and Tonya Stowers worked a two-
person route for Loomis Armored Services in Indianapolis, making stops at a
Kroger and a Dollar General. Wilson’s assignment at the Dollar General was
to service an ATM machine. After placing cash into the machine, Wilson
exited the store carrying an empty courier bag.
[4] As Wilson walked back toward the armored vehicle, two armed men exited a
white Chevrolet truck, which had positioned itself behind the Loomis vehicle.
The men wore ski masks and gloves, ran toward Wilson, and pointed handguns
at him. The two armed men grabbed Wilson’s empty courier bag. They then
seized Wilson by his hair, dragged him approximately ten feet to the rear of the
armo
← Back to Elizabeth Tavitas's profile
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}