Peo v. Gonzalez
── Peo v. Gonzalez ──
Court: Colorado Court of Appeals
Date: June 04, 2026
Category: General
24CA0785 Peo v Gonzalez 06-04-2026
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS
Court of Appeals No. 24CA0785
Douglas County District Court No. 22CR353
Honorable Ryan J. Stuart, Judge
The People of the State of Colorado,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Alfredo Manuel Gonzalez,
Defendant-Appellant.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART,
AND CASE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS
Division I
Opinion by JUDGE J. JONES
Fox and Dunn, JJ., concur
NOT PUBLISHED PURSUANT TO C.A.R. 35(e)
Announced June 4, 2026
Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General, Yaried A. Hailu, Assistant Attorney General
Fellow, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Megan A. Ring, Colorado State Public Defender, Kira L. Suyeishi, Deputy State
Public Defender, Denver, Colorado, for Defendant-Appellant
¶1 Defendant, Alfredo Manuel Gonzalez, appeals the district
court’s judgment of conviction entered on jury verdicts finding him
guilty of felony menacing, third degree assault (knowing/reckless),
prohibited use of a weapon (under the influence), and two counts of
disorderly conduct (discharge of a firearm in public and fighting in
public). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for
correction of the mittimus.
I. Background
¶2 One evening, Gonzalez went to a bar and had a conversation
with John Kilgore, a fellow bar patron. A while later, Coreen
Penniman — a woman Gonzalez had dated — arrived at the bar and
sat with Kilgore.
¶3 Gonzalez made a few comments about Penniman — some
positive and some negative — which eventually struck a nerve.
Penniman told Gonzalez that she wanted to be left alone and never
wanted to talk to him again. A short while later, Gonzalez and
Kilgore had a tussle in the men’s bathroom after Gonzalez made
another comment about Penniman.
¶4 The bar’s staff and patrons escorted Gonzalez and Kilgore out
of the building and into the parking lot. Security camera footage
1
shows Gonzalez getting into his Jeep, Kilgore starting to approach
the Jeep, and Gonzalez getting out and walking towards Kilgore.
Kilgore hit Gonzalez with something. The blow knocked Gonzalez to
the ground. When Gonzalez got up, he retrieved a gun from his
Jeep, walked toward Kilgore again, and fired six shots into the air.
Kilgore and others ran away. Gonzalez fired a seventh shot in
Kilgore’s direction.
¶5 The People charged Gonzalez with attempted first degree
murder (with a crime of violence sentence enhancer), felony
menacing, third degree assault, prohibited use of a weapon, and
two counts of disorderly conduct (discharging a firearm in public
and fighting in public).
¶6 At trial, Gonzalez argued that he had acted in self-defense.
The jury acquitted him of the attempted first degree murder charge,
and the lesser included offense of attempted second degree murder,
but found him guilty on all other counts. The district court
sentenced him to two years in the custody of the Department of
Corrections on the felony menacing conviction to run concurrently
with a controlling 364-day jail sentence on the other convictions.
2
II. Self-Defense Jury Instruction
A. Additional Background
¶7 Gonzalez was charged with a crime of violence sentence
enhancer under section 18-1.3-406(2)(a)(I)(A), C.R.S. 2025, as to the
attempted first degree murder charge because of his alleged use of a
firearm during the attempt. The prosecution tendered a jury
instruction defining “deadly weapon” as it related to the sentence
enhancer. The tendered instruction read, “Deadly weapon means a
firearm, whether loaded or unloaded.”
¶8 Defense counsel asked the court to include the full definition
of deadly weapo
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}