United States v. Clint Phillips
── United States v. Clint Phillips ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date: June 04, 2026
Category: General
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-2974
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Clint Eugene Phillips
Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
____________
Submitted: January 12, 2026
Filed: June 4, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Clint Eugene Phillips reported to his supervising officer as ordered after
concerns arose about his compliance with supervision conditions. He arrived at the
meeting on an unregistered motorcycle and declined to provide a urine sample.
Officers briefly detained Phillips for their safety and searched him pursuant to an
active warrantless search waiver. While searching Phillips’s person, officers
discovered a knife hidden in his bracelet. Officers then searched his motorcycle and
discovered approximately 250 grams of a mixture of methamphetamine, a digital
scale, an electric vaporizer, a glass pipe, and a plastic solo cup. The officers
subsequently searched Phillips’s home and located drug paraphernalia, clear bags,
bongs, digital scales, measuring devices, and suspected methamphetamine.
Additionally, in the bedroom they found two foam heads, one of which had a piece
of tape over the mouth with the words “help me” written on the tape. Law
enforcement also found a stolen motorcycle, several vehicle titles signed by seller
but not buyer, keys inside a safe, and several vehicles and motorcycles at Phillips’s
home. None of these vehicles were included in his sex offender registration
information. Officers also found several prohibited electronic media devices. After
the search, the investigation continued into Phillips’s digital life. There, officers
discovered multiple messages indicating drug sales and large Cash App transactions.
Based on this evidence, Phillips was charged in state court and convicted of
various state offenses. He was sentenced to imprisonment at the Arkansas
Department of Corrections.
In federal court, Phillips pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute
more than 50 grams of methamphetamine. Prior to his federal sentencing hearing,
the probation office calculated Phillips’s initial offense level to be 32 but reduced it
to 29 based on a 3-point reduction for acceptance of responsibility. Phillips’s
criminal history category was set at VI based on a nearly 30-year history of more
than two dozen convictions. These included drug-related offenses, assault, and
sexual assault. The probation office calculated the advisory Guidelines range to be
between 151 and 188 months’ imprisonment.
At sentencing, the government requested an upward variance, while Phillips
sought a low-end sentence of 151 months’ imprisonment. Phillips’s counsel argued
that Phillips was merely a small-time dealer and a serious addict. He asserted that
many of Phillips’s previous convictions received only probation and suspended
-2-
sentences, demonstrating that mitigating factors attended his crimes. Phillips then
spoke and apologized for his crime.
In pronouncing its sentence, the district court 1 began by acknowledging the
recommended Guidelines range and addressing the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors,
beginning with the aggravating factors. It ackn
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}