United States v. Dexter Lewis
── United States v. Dexter Lewis ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date: June 04, 2026
Category: General
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-2947
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Dexter Lewis
Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: January 12, 2026
Filed: June 4, 2026
[Published]
____________
Before SMITH, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
A jury found Dexter Lewis guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm,
in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). At sentencing, the district court 1 found that
Lewis “possessed [the] firearm . . . in connection with another felony [offense]” and
1
The Honorable Stephen R. Clark, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri.
therefore applied a four-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B).2
On appeal, Lewis challenges the district court’s application of the enhancement. We
affirm.
I. Background
One evening, law enforcement officers observed a Saab fail to stop at a stop
sign. The officers activated their overhead lights. In response, the Saab—driven by
Lewis—accelerated and sped away at a high rate of speed. Law enforcement pursued
the Saab for approximately 30 minutes. During the chase, Lewis disobeyed traffic
control devices and rammed numerous vehicles that were in his path. Officers
successfully deployed spike strips at five different locations and deflated all four
tires on Lewis’s Saab. Lewis’s speed decreased dramatically. Lewis then put a
firearm in the purse of his girlfriend, the passenger, over her objection. After doing
so, Lewis jumped out of the vehicle while it was in motion. He fled on foot. After
the vehicle crashed, his girlfriend exited the vehicle and ran in Lewis’s direction.
Officers apprehended and arrested them close to the abandoned vehicle. Officers
searched his girlfriend’s purse and discovered Lewis’s firearm.
A jury subsequently found Lewis guilty of being a felon in possession of a
firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Prior to sentencing, the probation
office prepared a presentence report (PSR). It included only an enhancement based
on the firearm being stolen. The government notified the probation office that the
PSR omitted additional enhancements for obstruction of justice and fleeing. The
probation office responded that the final PSR would contain the enhancements.
A subsequent PSR included an obstruction-of-justice enhancement but did not
include an enhancement for Lewis’s flight. The government objected to the PSR and
2
“The current version of the Guidelines, effective November 1, 2025, provides
this enhancement at USSG § 2K2.1(b)(7)(B). References herein to USSG
§ 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) refer to the version of the Guidelines used to determine [Lewis’s]
offense level at the time of sentencing.” United States v. Naylor, No. 24-1490, 2026
WL 237724, at *1 n.1 (3d Cir. Jan. 29, 2026) (unpublished).
-2-
sought an additional four-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B)
based on Lewis possessing a firearm in furtherance of another felony—resisting
arrest. Alternatively, the government sought a two-level enhancement pursuant to
U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2 for Lewis recklessly cre
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}