People v. Gracia
── People v. Gracia ──
Court: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date: June 05, 2026
Category: General
2026 IL App (1st) 242113-U
FIFTH DIVISION
June 5, 2026
No. 1-24-2113
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and is not precedent except in the
limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).
______________________________________________________________________________
IN THE
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
FIRST DISTRICT
______________________________________________________________________________
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Appeal from the
) Circuit Court of
Plaintiff-Appellee, ) Cook County.
)
v. ) No. 2021 CR 0784001
)
MICHAEL GRACIA, ) Honorable
) Aleksandra Gillespie,
Defendant-Appellant. ) Judge Presiding.
JUSTICE MIKVA delivered the judgment of the court.
Presiding Justice Mitchell and Justice Johnson concurred in the judgment.
ORDER
¶1 Held: Defendant’s attempted first degree murder convictions are affirmed. The evidence
sufficiently established his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and his counsel was
not ineffective for failing to object to out-of-court statements made by his
codefendant, where it was presumed that the trial judge considered that evidence
only in the codefendant’s severed but simultaneous bench trial.
¶2 Following a bench trial, defendant Michael Gracia was convicted on two counts of
attempted first degree murder and sentenced to concurrent terms of 31 years and 26 years in prison.
Mr. Gracia argues on direct appeal that (1) the State’s evidence was insufficient to prove his guilt
No. 1-24-2113
beyond a reasonable doubt, and (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the
admission of text messages sent by his codefendant that were inadmissible hearsay in Mr. Gracia’s
case. We are unpersuaded on both grounds and affirm Mr. Gracia’s convictions.
¶3 I. BACKGROUND
¶4 The State charged Mr. Gracia by indictment with nine counts of attempted first degree
murder (720 ILCS 5/8-4(a), 9-1(a)(1) (West 2020)), one count of aggravated battery with a firearm
(id. § 12-3.05(e)(1)), and two counts of aggravated discharge of a firearm (id. § 24-1.2(a)(2)),
charges all stemming from shots fired from a truck at two individuals, Sergio Cabral and Miguel
Sierra, on January 16, 2021. Mr. Gracia and his codefendant, Nicholas Athans, were tried in
severed but simultaneous bench trials, beginning on November 6, 2023, with the State proceeding
against Mr. Gracia as the principal and against Mr. Athans, not a party to this appeal, on a theory
of accountability. The evidence at Mr. Gracia’s trial was as follows.
¶5 A. The State’s Eyewitness Testimony
¶6 While another witness, Evelyn Hernandez, saw the shooting from her living room window,
she could only identify the truck. She also provided evidence that the front driver’s side window
of her own vehicle, a black PT Cruiser parked in front of her building, had been shot out and that
there was a bullet lodged in the steering column. Only the two victims, M
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}