People v. Johnson
── People v. Johnson ──
Court: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date: June 05, 2026
Category: General
2026 IL App (1st) 220494-UB
No. 1-22-0494
Order filed June 5, 2026
Sixth Division
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and is not precedent except in the
limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).
______________________________________________________________________________
IN THE
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
FIRST DISTRICT
______________________________________________________________________________
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Appeal from the
) Circuit Court of
Plaintiff-Appellee, ) Cook County.
)
v. ) No. 17 CR 8698
)
ANTRELL JOHNSON, ) Honorable
) Thaddeus L. Wilson,
Defendant-Appellant. ) Judge, presiding.
JUSTICE HYMAN delivered the judgment of the court.
Justices Pucinski and Oden Johnson concurred in the judgment.
ORDER
¶1 Held: Affirmed. Trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance by failing to call a
second alibi witness.
¶2 In Antrell Johnson’s first appeal, we reversed his conviction after finding the eyewitness
identifications insufficient to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Our supreme court
reversed that judgment and remanded for us to address the remaining unresolved issue—whether
trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to call a second alibi witness, Vernon
Johnson. People v. Johnson, 2026 IL 131337, ¶ 104.
No. 1-22-0494
¶3 Johnson contends Vernon’s testimony would have strengthened Kennedi Myles’s alibi
testimony. We disagree. Vernon’s proposed testimony was weak, uncertain, and contradicted
Myles’s account of Johnson’s whereabouts at the time of the shooting. Thus, Johnson fails to show
a reasonable probability that the trial’s result would have differed had Vernon testified. We affirm.
¶4 Background
¶5 As this appeal involves an unresolved issue from our earlier decision, we recite only those
facts necessary to resolve the question on remand: Whether Johnson’s counsel was ineffective in
failing to call a second alibi witness, Johnson’s cousin, Vernon Johnson.
¶6 The jury found Johnson guilty of first degree murder and that he personally discharged a
firearm that proximately cause the death of Taurean “Tori” Tyler (720 ILCS 5/9-
1(a)(1), (2) (West 2016)) and found him not guilty of attempted first degree murder of DeAngelo
Mixon (720 ILCS 5/8-4(a) (West 2016)).
¶7 Several witnesses identified Johnson as the shooter. Tristan Thomas identified that Johnson
in a photo array and at trial, though he acknowledged the shooter’s face was partially covered.
Mixon identified Johnson in a photo array and video-recorded statement but recanted portions of
those identifications at trial, testifying that he was unsure who shot him. Eyewitness Janeese
Washington identified Johnson in a photo array and again at trial. Security video depicted a person
in white pants and a dark jacket running from the area immediately after the shooting.
¶8 Police officers testified eyewitnesses described the shooter shortly after the shooting.
¶9 Johnson’s defense centered on an alibi. His former girlfriend,
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}