Preston v. State
── Preston v. State ──
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date: June 02, 2026
Category: General
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court
Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the
opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any
prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and
official text of the opinion.
In the
Supreme Court of Georgia
No. S26A0122
Keyondre Preston
v.
The State
On Appeal from the Superior Court of Newton County
No. 2021CR6892
Decided: June 2, 2026
LAGRUA, Justice.
Appellant Keyondre Preston appeals his convictions for
malice murder and other crimes related to the shooting death of
Shelvis Hillman. 1 On appeal, Preston argues that (1) the evidence
1 Hillman was killed on April 3, 2019. On June 7, 2019, a Newton
County grand jury indicted Preston, and on July 23, 2021, a grand jury re-
indicted Preston for the following counts: malice murder (Count 1); felony
murder predicated on armed robbery (Count 2); felony murder predicated on
aggravated assault (Count 3); armed robbery (Counts 4–6); aggravated assault
(Counts 7–9); burglary in the first degree (Counts 10 and 11); and possession
of a firearm during the commission of a felony (Counts 12–14). Preston was
tried from October 18 to 21, 2021, and the jury found Preston guilty on all
counts except Count 2. The trial court sentenced Preston to life without the
possibility of parole on Count 1; life in prison on each of Counts 4–6, to run
concurrently; twenty years to run concurrent on Count 10; and five years to
run consecutive on each of Counts 12–14. The remaining counts merged or
were vacated by operation of law. Preston filed a timely motion for new trial,
which he later amended on September 2, 2023. The trial court denied the
motion on October 30, 2024. Preston filed a timely notice of appeal, and his
case was docketed to this Court’s term beginning in December 2025 and
submitted for a decision on the briefs.
was constitutionally insufficient to support the verdicts; (2) the
trial court abused its discretion by admitting other-act evidence
of two prior incidents; and (3) the trial court erred by refusing his
request to charge the jury on justification and related concepts.
For the reasons set forth below, Preston’s arguments fail.
Accordingly, we affirm.
The evidence presented at trial showed that, during the
evening hours of April 3, 2019, Preston shot and killed Hillman
at the home of his uncle, Charlie Hillman. Preston then robbed
Hillman, Charlie, and Curtis Kimbrough, Charlie’s roommate.
Earlier that same day, Preston, who also went by “Peanut,”
accompanied David Catlett to the home of Hillman’s father,
Stanley Hillman, who was friends with Catlett. When Preston
and Catlett arrived at Stanley’s house, Stanley’s fiancée told them
that Stanley was not home, but the two men came inside the
house anyway. 2 Stanley’s dog was in the house and began barking
at them. Preston pulled a gun and shot at the dog but missed.
Stanley’s fiancée then “threw them outside,” called Stanley, and
told Stanley to come home because somebody just shot at his dog.
After receiving this call, Stanley returned home, a
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}