Mejia v. Gurvits CA4/2
── Mejia v. Gurvits CA4/2 ──
Court: California Court of Appeal
Date: June 05, 2026
Category: General
Filed 6/5/26 Mejia v. Gurvits CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
CHONA MEJIA et al.,
Plaintiffs and Appellants, E083293
v. (Super.Ct.No. CVRI2105631)
VADIM GURVITS D.O. et al., OPINION
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Erica A. Keen, Judge.
Affirmed.
Chona Mejia and James Mejia, in pro. per., for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Davis, Grass, Goldstein & Finlay and Gabriel M. Benrubi for Defendants and
Respondents.
1
In this medical malpractice action, plaintiffs Chona and James Mejia appeal from
the summary judgment entered in favor of defendants Vadim Gurvits, D.O.; Abigail
Baker, N.P.; and Britanny Travis, M.A.1 We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Plantiffs’ Lawsuit
Plaintiffs represented themselves in the trial court, as they do on appeal. In the
operative complaint, the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), Chona asserted three
causes of action—(1) medical negligence against all three defendants; (2) medical
negligence against Baker; and (3) negligent hiring and supervision against Dr. Gurvits—
and James asserted a claim for loss of consortium.2
To support her claims, Chona alleged the following: She was a patient of Dr.
Gurvits at his practices of Premier Family Care and Premier Urgent Care from 2018
through April 2021. She suffered from hyperthyroidism, but Dr. Gurvits misdiagnosed
her with hypothyroidism and wrongly prescribed a non FDA-approved medication called
Armour Thyroid to address the misdiagnosed hypothyroidism. Dr. Gurvits first
prescribed the Armour Thyroid medication in June 2019. In August 2019, Dr. Gurvits
instructed Chona to reduce her dosage by half. In February 2020, after she had been
taking the medication for eight months, Dr. Gurvits advised her to stop taking it
1 Because they share a last name, we use the Mejias’ first names when referring to
them individually. No disrespect is intended.
2 In response to defendants’ demurrer, the trial court dismissed Chona’s claim of
fraud against all three defendants.
2
altogether. For the next 14 months, Chona received no thyroid treatment from Dr.
Gurvits. Then, in May 2021, she saw an endocrinologist who diagnosed her with
“grave[s’] disease/hyperthyroidism” and prescribed the FDA-approved drug
Methimazole.
Chona alleged that Dr. Gurvits was negligent for failing to detect her
hyperthyroidism and prescribing Armour Thyroid, that Baker (Dr. Gurvits’s nurse
practitioner) was negligent for refilling the prescription, and that Travis (Dr. Gurvits’s
medical assistant) was negligent for telling her that “Armour Thyroid is for
hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism and will go away without treatment.” Chona
alleged that defendants were the “proximate cause” of her “harm, past damages, and
future damages.” She alleged that “if Dr. Gurvits did not abandon my thyroid treatment,
I would have obtained a better result, or as an alternative, if he had timely referred me to
an endocrinologist, this lawsuit would not have been filed.”
To support his claim, James alleged tha
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}