United States v. Holmes
── United States v. Holmes ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date: June 05, 2026
Category: Direct Criminal
Case: 25-60352 Document: 68-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/05/2026
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
____________
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 25-60352
Summary Calendar FILED
____________ June 5, 2026
Lyle W. Cayce
United States of America, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Marcellus Holmes,
Defendant—Appellant.
______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 1:24-CR-68-2
______________________________
Before King, Haynes, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
The attorney appointed to represent Marcellus Holmes has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Holmes has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Holmes’s
_____________________
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 25-60352 Document: 68-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/05/2026
No. 25-60352
response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
R. 42.2.
2
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}