Parker v. Tensley
── Parker v. Tensley ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Date: May 29, 2026
Category: General
Appellate Case: 26-6000 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 05/29/2026 Page: 1
FILED
United States Court of Appeals
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT May 29, 2026
_________________________________
Christopher M. Wolpert
Clerk of Court
ALVIN PARKER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v. No. 26-6000
(D.C. No. 5:25-CV-00767-D)
SCOTT TENSLEY, (W.D. Okla.)
Respondent - Appellee.
_________________________________
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *
_________________________________
Before TYMKOVICH, PHILLIPS, and FEDERICO, Circuit Judges.
_________________________________
Alvin Parker, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, 1 applies for a certificate of
appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition
for habeas relief. He also moves to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. For the
reasons below, we DENY a COA, DENY Parker’s IFP motion, and DISMISS this
appeal.
*
This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case,
res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value
consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
1
As a pro se litigant, we construe Parker’s application liberally. See Luo v. Wang,
71 F.4th 1289, 1291 n.1 (10th Cir. 2023). But we do not act as his advocate. Id.
Appellate Case: 26-6000 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 05/29/2026 Page: 2
I. Background
An Oklahoma state jury convicted Parker of second-degree murder in 1990 for
killing an off-duty police officer. The state judge sentenced Parker to 199 years in
prison. Parker appealed to the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals (OCCA). The
OCCA affirmed his conviction and sentence in 1994.
Oklahoma enacted the Oklahoma Survivors’ Act (OSA) in 2024, which allows a
prisoner to file a “request to apply for resentencing” with his original sentencing court.
Okla. Stat. tit. 22 § 1090.5(A). A prisoner convicted of second-degree murder must
establish by “clear and convincing evidence” that he meets certain statutory criteria
before the court will permit him to apply for resentencing. Id. § 1090.3(D); see also
Okla. Stat. tit. 57 § 571(2)(j).
Parker filed a request to apply for resentencing under the OSA with the state
district court. He claimed that his cousin and the victim (the off-duty officer) “set [him]
up” so the officer could “coerce him into becoming a confidential informant” like his
cousin. Aplt. Br. at 11. Parker said the alleged scheme caused him to kill the officer so
he could escape. He argued that he thus met the parameters of the statute because his
“victim was the perpetrator of . . . psychological abuse by . . . a family member” and that
“abuse was related to and was a substantial contributing factor in causing [him] to
commit the” murder. Okla. Stat. tit. 22 § 1090.3(C), (D). Parker included various
documents (e.g., trial transcripts) with his request that he alleged corroborated the abuse.
The state district court denied his request. It found Parker was not eligible for
resentencing because he failed to show that he met the OSA’s
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}