People v. Ellison CA6
── People v. Ellison CA6 ──
Court: California Court of Appeal
Date: June 04, 2026
Category: General
Filed 6/4/26 P. v. Ellison CA6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
THE PEOPLE, H052931
(Monterey County
Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 23CR008881)
v.
MICHAEL ELLISON,
Defendant and Appellant.
Defendant Michael Ellison was convicted by jury of first degree murder (count 1),
three counts of assault by a life prisoner (counts 2, 4, and 6), attempted murder of a peace
officer (count 3), and attempted murder (count 5). As relevant to the appeal, the jury
found defendant committed the murder and both attempted murders with premeditation
and deliberation. The charges stemmed from three separate incidents that took place
while defendant was in prison. Defendant contends the trial court committed prejudicial
error when it granted the prosecution’s request for consolidation of the charges. He
further argues consolidation violated his constitutional rights to due process and a fair
trial. As we will explain, we see no prejudicial error and will affirm the judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
A. COUNTS 1 AND 2
At the time of the events in April 2018, defendant was incarcerated at Salinas
Valley State Prison. While inmates were exercising in the prison yard, correctional
officer Julian Narvaez saw an inmate named Jason Lewis seated at a picnic table with
defendant standing behind him. Defendant started punching Lewis in the back, and
Narvaez reacted by telling all of the inmates in the yard to get down on the ground. Most
of the inmates complied, but defendant and Lewis did not. Lewis “got up from the table
and was trying to back away from” defendant but “was unsuccessful at defending
himself, falling to the floor.” As Lewis fell, “the strikes that were punches turned into a
stabbing-like motion.” Narvaez saw blood on Lewis’s shirt. Defendant crouched next to
Lewis and continued stabbing him. He did not stop until officers approached him. The
“skirmish line” that responded to the incident included correctional officers Xochitl
Gonzales and Rogelio Lopez, Jr., who both testified at trial and corroborated Narvaez’s
account.
As officers subdued defendant, he attempted to discard an object. Officers
recovered the object, which appeared to be an inmate-manufactured weapon. It was
made of metal with a cloth handle and was between eight and nine inches long. Lewis
later died from his injuries.
B. COUNTS 3 AND 4
In July 2019, defendant was housed in the “administrative segregation” wing at
Soledad State Prison. Correctional officers Marvin Bonilla and Thomas Cleary escorted
defendant to the shower. When Bonilla removed defendant’s handcuffs, defendant “spun
around” and “stepped out of the shower.” Defendant said, “Come on” and “rushed”
toward Cleary, “swinging” and “punching” at him. The officers unsuccessfully
attempted to subdue defendant with pepper spray. Defendant continued swinging his
arms at Cleary, making contact with Cleary’s face. Cleary pushed defendant away and
Bonilla “tried to get a hold of him,” but Bonilla was unable “to take him down to the
floor.” Bonilla slipped and fell on the floor, allowing defendant to break free and rush at
Cleary again. Defendant also slipped and fell but continued swinging at Cleary, making
contact with Cleary’s leg. Bonilla got up and grabbed defendant from behind, at which
p
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}