People v. Myers CA2/1
── People v. Myers CA2/1 ──
Court: California Court of Appeal
Date: June 04, 2026
Category: General
Filed 6/4/26 P. v. Myers CA2/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
THE PEOPLE, B341274
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County
Super. Ct. No. A577750)
v.
BYRON CHAPIN MYERS,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los
Angeles County, Dorothy L. Shubin, Judge. Affirmed with
directions.
Michele A. Douglass, under appointment by the Court of
Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Charles C. Ragland, Chief
Assistant Attorney General, Susan Sullivan Pithey, Assistant
Attorney General, Wyatt E. Bloomfield and Christopher G.
Sanchez, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and
Respondent.
_______________________
Byron Chapin Myers appeals from a judgment entered
after resentencing, contending the superior court erred by
reimposing upper terms for his kidnapping, rape, and forcible
oral copulation convictions. We disagree and affirm, subject to
ordering the abstract of judgment modified to correct the
calculation of Myers’s custody credits and another clerical error.
BACKGROUND
In 1989, a jury convicted Myers of kidnapping (Pen. Code,1
§ 207, subd. (a); count 1), robbery (§ 211; count 2), unlawful
driving or taking of a vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a);
count 3), forcible rape (§ 261; count 4), forcible oral copulation
(§ 288a; count 5), kidnapping for robbery (§ 209, subd. (b);
count 6), and felon in possession of a firearm (§ 12021, subd. (a);
count 7). The jury also found true that Myers personally used a
firearm. (§§ 12022.3, subd. (a), 12022.5, subd. (a).) Myers later
admitted he had served a prior prison term. (§ 667.5, former
subd. (b).)
Myers was ultimately sentenced to imprisonment for life
with the possibility of parole plus 36 years four months,
calculated as follows: a life term plus two years on count 6, eight
years plus two years on count 1, eight months on count 3, eight
years plus three years on count 4, eight years plus three years on
count 5, eight months for count 7, and one year for the prior
prison term enhancement. Count 2 was stayed. The sentences
imposed on counts 1, 4, and 5 were the upper term (plus
enhancements). The abstract of judgment (filed in 1992) failed to
include the two-year firearm enhancement on count 6 despite the
court’s imposition of it. It accordingly misstated the determinate
1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.
2
portion of the sentence as 34 years four months instead of the
correct amount of 36 years four months. The court awarded 445
days of custody credit (247 actual days and 198 conduct days).
After the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
(CDCR) identified Myers as eligible for resentencing, the court
appointed counsel for Myers and that counsel requested
resentencing pursuant to section 1172.75. The People objected to
any reduction of the sentence beyond striking the one-year prior
prison term enhancement. That objection was based primarily on
Myers’s offense conduct, which involved him kidnapping a college
student, commandeering her car, and forcing her into the car’s
trunk. After driving around for about 40 minutes with his victim
in the trunk, Myers released her and, at gunpoint, made her
withdraw cash from a
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}