Campbell v. Harrison County
── Campbell v. Harrison County ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date: June 03, 2026
Category: Civil Rights
Case: 25-60328 Document: 55-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/03/2026
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
____________ United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 25-60328
FILED
June 3, 2026
____________
Lyle W. Cayce
Carlton Campbell, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellant,
versus
Harrison County Circuit Court; Harrison County
Probation; Crosby Parker; Billy Stage; Joel Smith;
Damian Holcomb,
Defendants—Appellees.
______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 1:24-CV-224
______________________________
Before Jones, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
Appellant Carlton Campbell, proceeding pro se in district court and
on appeal, challenges the Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of his civil-rights action
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Campbell alleges various constitutional violations
arising from a probation revocation hearing for his 2017 Mississippi
_____________________
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 25-60328 Document: 55-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/03/2026
No. 25-60328
conviction of unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We
AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal of all claims.
Following a 2016 traffic stop, Campbell was convicted of Mississippi
Code § 97-37-5 for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon predicated on
a 1997 felony conviction and sentenced to five years of imprisonment and five
years of post-release supervision. Campbell was paroled prior to serving his
full sentence, but the Mississippi Department of Corrections later filed a
petition to revoke Campbell’s post-release supervision for failure to pay
$2,873.50 in court costs.
Campbell subsequently filed constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 against various defendants, including Damian Holcomb, his court-
appointed counsel at his conviction; Harrison County Circuit Court;
Harrison County Probation; and Crosby Parker, Billy Stage, and Joel Smith
(the “Prosecutor Defendants”), the prosecutors that pursued his conviction.
The district court dismissed the claims against all defendants pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The district court held that
Harrison County Circuit Court, Harrison County Probation, and the
Prosecutor Defendants were protected by immunity and that Holcomb had
not violated Campbell’s constitutional rights. As alternative grounds to
support dismissal, the district court held that Campbell’s claims were barred
by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994).
Campbell also sought leave to amend to add as a defendant Judge Lisa
P. Dodson, the Harrison County Circuit Court judge who presided over
Campbell’s criminal proceedings. The district court denied Campbell’s
motion, finding that amendment would be futile because Judge Dodson is
immune from suit for judicial functions arising out of her official capacity.
The district court also noted that, to the extent Campbell seeks to add Judge
Dodson to prevent her from revoking his supervised release, the Younger
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}