All States › Evidence
Neutral Court Opinion Jun 03, 2026

United States v. Haynes

── United States v. Haynes ── Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Date: June 02, 2026 Category: Direct Criminal Case: 25-11089 Document: 70-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/02/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 25-11089 June 2, 2026 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Morris Burrell Haynes, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:22-CR-326-2 ______________________________ Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Morris Burrell Haynes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Haynes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-11089 Document: 70-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/02/2026 No. 25-11089 with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 2
CourtListener · Jun 02, 2026
Original link
Share on X Share on Facebook
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own address as its source and its own type. #}