United States v. Williams
── United States v. Williams ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date: June 02, 2026
Category: Direct Criminal
Case: 24-50745 Document: 207-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/02/2026
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
____________
FILED
June 2, 2026
No. 24-50745
____________ Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Atorius Marquis Williams; Demonta Daniels,
Defendants—Appellants,
consolidated with
_____________
No. 24-50769
_____________
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Trashawn Lamar Alexander
Defendant—Appellant.
Case: 24-50745 Document: 207-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/02/2026
______________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC Nos. 6:20-CR-155-3,
6:20-CR-155-4, 6:20-CR-155-5
______________________________
Before Wiener, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
These consolidated cases arise from final criminal judgments and
sentences against Atorius Marquis Williams, Demonta Daniels, and
Trashawn Lamar Alexander (collectively, “Defendants”). Defendants were
indicted for various charges related to their involvement with a criminal
organization referred to as “Killers with Aggression” (hereinafter
“KWA”), including various murders and robberies. The district court held
a jury trial, the jury found Defendants guilty on all counts, and the district
court sentenced Defendants to terms including life imprisonment. On
appeal, Defendants assert that the district court’s jury instructions on the
firearms charges against them were defective, and Alexander argues that the
evidence was legally insufficient to establish a “pattern of racketeering
activity” for his charge under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962. We AFFIRM.
I. Background
Per the operative indictment, KWA was a criminal “organization
engaged in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce by, among other
things, conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and conspiracy to rob
persons engaged in the distribution of controlled substances,” and which
“historically encompassed” the “East Temple” area of Temple, Texas. In
_____________________
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
2
Case: 24-50745 Document: 207-1 Page: 3 Date Filed: 06/02/2026
No. 24-50745
c/w No. 24-50769
October 2020, Defendants, alongside seven other individuals, were indicted
for multiple counts related to their involvement with KWA. The district
court designated this matter a “complex case” in December 2020 and tolled
the applicable speedy trial provisions. A first superseding indictment was
filed in October 2023, and a second superseding indictment was filed against
Defendants in December 2023. 1
In this operative indictment, a grand jury charged Defendants with
eight counts: (1) Count One, which charged Defendants
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}