Roderick Miles v. Frank Bisignano
── Roderick Miles v. Frank Bisignano ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date: June 01, 2026
Category: General
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1805 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/01/2026 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1805
RODERICK L. MILES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security; MEREDITH TUCKER
EDWARDS; BOB BOLLINGER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:22-cv-01116-WO-JEP)
Submitted: May 28, 2026 Decided: June 1, 2026
Before WYNN, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roderick L. Miles, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher John Brackett, Special Assistant United
States Attorney, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland; Jean
Godfrey, Special Assistant United States Attorney, CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY,
Chicago, Illinois, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1805 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/01/2026 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Roderick L. Miles appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Miles v.
Bisignano, No. 1:22-cv-01116-WO-JEP (M.D.N.C. June 17, 2025). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}