David Forbes v. A.S.G.D.C.
── David Forbes v. A.S.G.D.C. ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date: June 01, 2026
Category: General
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6816 Doc: 24 Filed: 06/01/2026 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6816
DAVID FORBES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
A.S.G.D.C.; LEONARDO BROWN; CRAYMAN HARVEY; DR. SHAFFER;
MR. PAMPEL, a/k/a Mr. Pamper,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:24-cv-01054-JFA)
Submitted: May 28, 2026 Decided: June 1, 2026
Before WYNN, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Forbes, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred Johnston Cox, Lindsay Anne Joyner, James
Clayton Mitchell, III, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, PA, Columbia, South Carolina;
Mark Brandon Goddard, TURNER PADGET GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6816 Doc: 24 Filed: 06/01/2026 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
David Forbes appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for
summary judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Forbes v. Alvin S. Glenn Det. Ctr., No. 0:24-cv-01054-JFA (D.S.C. Sep. 2, 2025). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}