United States v. Richard Brasser
── United States v. Richard Brasser ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date: May 28, 2026
Category: General
USCA4 Appeal: 25-4165 Doc: 52 Filed: 05/28/2026 Pg: 1 of 22
PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-4140
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
GREGORY GENTNER,
Defendant – Appellant.
No. 25-4165
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
RICHARD BRASSER,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:23-cr-00006-MOC-SCR-2; 3:23-cr-
00006-MOC-SCR-1)
Argued: March 20, 2026 Decided: May 28, 2026
USCA4 Appeal: 25-4165 Doc: 52 Filed: 05/28/2026 Pg: 2 of 22
Before KING, WYNN, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge King wrote the opinion, in which Judge Wynn and
Judge Rushing joined.
ARGUED: Eric Jason Foster, LAW OFFICE OF RICK FOSTER, Asheville, North
Carolina; Juan Chardiet, McLean, Virginia, for Appellants. Jason Poole, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF:
S. Robert Lyons, Katie Bagley, Joseph B. Syverson, Tax Division, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Russ Ferguson, United States Attorney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
2
USCA4 Appeal: 25-4165 Doc: 52 Filed: 05/28/2026 Pg: 3 of 22
KING, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Gregory Gentner and Richard Brasser (collectively, the “defendants”)
were each convicted by a jury in the Western District of North Carolina in 2024 for five
separate felony offenses of failing to pay over to the federal Treasury tax money withheld
from employee wages, commonly known as trust-fund taxes, in violation of 26 U.S.C.
§ 7202. 1 On appeal, the defendants challenge various aspects of the district court’s
underlying proceedings, as well as the court’s denial of their motion for a new trial. As
explained herein, because we are satisfied to reject each of the defendants’ appellate
contentions, we affirm the criminal judgments.
I.
A.
1.
As background, when an employer pays the earnings of its employees, the employer
is required by law to withhold certain taxes from the employees’ wages. See 26 U.S.C.
§§ 3402, 3102. The employer is obligated to then pay over those withheld taxes of its
employees to the federal government. Id. Because employers pay over those taxes to the
1
Section 7202 of Title 26 of the United States Code, which underlies each of the
convictions challenged herein, provides, in relevant part, that “[a]ny person required under
this title to collect . . . and pay over any tax imposed . . . who willfully fails to . . . pay over
such tax shall . . . be guilty of a felony[.]” Per the Internal Revenue Code, such taxes are
held in “trust for the United States” until the employer makes a federal tax payment of the
withheld funds. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 7501(a), 3102, 3402.
3
USCA4 Appeal: 25-4165 Doc: 52 Filed: 05/2
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}