State of Arizona v. Ricky Alonzo Hippensteel
── State of Arizona v. Ricky Alonzo Hippensteel ──
Court: Arizona Supreme Court
Date: June 01, 2026
Category: General
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
STATE OF ARIZONA,
Appellee,
v.
RICKY ALONZO HIPPENSTEEL,
Appellant.
No. CR-25-0203-PR
Filed June 1, 2026
Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
The Honorable Justin Beresky, Judge
No. CR2021-123897-001
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED
Opinion of the Court of Appeals,
Division One
572 P.3d 579 (App. 2025)
VACATED
COUNSEL:
Damon A. Rossi (argued), Deputy Public Defender, Maricopa County
Office of the Public Defender, Phoenix, Attorneys for Ricky Alonzo
Hippensteel
Kristin K. Mayes, Arizona Attorney General, Alice M. Jones (argued),
Deputy Solicitor General/Section Chief of Criminal Appeals, Phoenix,
Attorneys for State of Arizona
STATE v. HIPPENSTEEL
Opinion of the Court
Kevin D. Heade, Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice, Florence,
Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice
CHIEF JUSTICE TIMMER authored the Opinion of the Court, in which
VICE CHIEF JUSTICE LOPEZ, JUSTICES BOLICK, BEENE, KING, and
CRUZ joined. JUSTICE MONTGOMERY dissented.
CHIEF JUSTICE TIMMER, Opinion of the Court:
¶1 A jury convicted Ricky Alonzo Hippensteel of second degree
murder after he stabbed Derek Joseph Odle. Without objection, the trial
court incorrectly instructed the jury on the crime of provocation
manslaughter, see A.R.S. § 13-1103(A)(2), and provided a flawed verdict
form. The issue here is whether these errors constituted fundamental,
prejudicial errors requiring a new trial. We conclude they did.
BACKGROUND
¶2 In June 2021, Hippensteel and Odle were friends living in
Tonopah, Arizona. In the early morning hours of June 25, Hippensteel
sought out Odle in an informal compound of mobile homes and other
structures. The two men fought outside a trailer where Odle was staying,
and Odle was stabbed to death. The State indicted Hippensteel for first
degree murder and related lesser offenses.
¶3 At trial, Hippensteel testified and did not deny stabbing Odle
but asserted he acted in self-defense and to prevent a crime (assault).
According to Hippensteel, he approached Odle outside Odle’s trailer to
discuss a missing tractor while Odle was using a knife to scrape or cut
wires. The two began arguing, and at some point, Hippensteel looked
away. When he turned back, he saw Odle raise the knife toward him,
prompting Hippensteel to react immediately by blocking the knife, thereby
sustaining a stab wound to his hand. The confrontation then escalated
into a physical fight involving “grabbing, hitting, throwing, [and]
punching,” during which Odle was fatally stabbed. Hippensteel told
jurors that he did not remember stabbing Odle, and that when he left the
2
STATE v. HIPPENSTEEL
Opinion of the Court
scene, Odle was “standing alive.” The prosecutor impeached Hippensteel
with evidence that he previously told a detective he had not seen Odle for
two weeks or been to the compound for years. Hippensteel admitted
lying to the detective but claimed he was telling the truth to the jury.
¶4 Kathleen Abrigo, Odle’s girlfriend, provided the jury with a
different version of events. Abrigo testified that she and Odle were asleep
in the trailer when Hippensteel stood outside yelling about taking Odle’s
car. Abrigo woke Odle and told him to go talk to Hippensteel, and Odle
did so, asking “what’s up?” From inside the trailer, Abrigo watched the
exchange through a window and saw Hippensteel apparently punching
Odle until Odle
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}