American Civil Liberties Union of Delaware v. The Town of Fenwick Island
── American Civil Liberties Union of Delaware v. The Town of Fenwick Island ──
Court: Superior Court of Delaware
Date: May 26, 2026
Category: General
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES :
UNION OF DELAWARE, :
:
Plaintiff, : C.A. No. S25C-12-003 CAK
:
v. :
:
THE TOWN OF FENWICK ISLAND, :
:
Defendant. :
:
Submitted: May 21, 2026
Decided: May 26, 2026
UPON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Granted
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Andrew Bernstein, Esquire, American Civil Liberties Union, 100 W. 10th Street
#706, Wilmington, DE 19801; Attorney for Plaintiff.
Luke W. Mette, Esquire, Joseph Grubb, Esquire, Mark A. Denney, Esquire,
Brockstedt Mandalas Federico, 1413 Savannah Road, Suite 1, Lewes, DE 19958;
Attorneys for Defendant.
KARSNITZ, R.J.
INTRODUCTION
What is a “person?” When one cuts to the heart of this case, that is the
question. The philosopher Diogo Joao Baptista Gomes of Brachtenbach,
Luxembourg has answered the question as follows:
The question of what a person is isn’t exclusive to philosophy.
Consequently, there are many answers. In a physiological and
biological context, a person is a human being with certain essential
physiological and biological characteristics.
Legally, the answer is broader. According to the law, a person is
anyone or anything that can initiate and be subject to legal
proceedings. By this conception, any adult, corporation, or institution
is a person, but a minor is not a person, a fetus is not a person, and a
humanoid robot … is not a person. This highlights that legal
personhood is dependent solely on legal recognition.
In this sense a legal person is like a political person. A political person
is anyone who has citizenship. The humanoid robot … has been
granted citizenship in Saudi Arabia, which demonstrates the
contingency of political personhood. Moreover, there is no shortage of
people who have had their citizenship stripped, whose political
personhood is therefore non-existent.
In philosophy, a human being is a person if they’re a moral agent,
making moral judgements and taking moral actions. Metaphysically,
the set of criteria for personhood include rationality or logical
reasoning, consciousness, self-consciousness, use of language, ability
to initiate action, moral agency, and intelligence. The humanoid robot
or a young child may meet sufficient criteria here. A corporation or
institution does not.
In practice, however, only legal and political personhood are of
significance, and these are contingent on recognition by political or
legal institutions. However, metaphysical and moral personhood
provide an intellectual foundation upon which to discuss legal and
2
political personhood. Therefore, I suggest that a person in its full sense
– both theoretically and practically – is a metaphysical and moral being
with legal and political recognition. The former is sufficient for
theoretical personhood and the latter is sufficient for practical
personhood, and both are necessary for full personhood. [emphasis
supplied]1
In 2008, the Delaware General Assembly amended the Charter of the Town
of Fenwick Island (“Fenwick”), a small coastal community,2 to allow Fenwick to
expand its voter registration rolls to allow individuals to cast votes on behalf of
trusts, limited liability companies, partnerships, and corporations that own property
in Fenwick. Today, the overwhelming majority of legal entity property owners in
Fenwick registered to vote, and on whose behalf
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}