Patrick Willhoite, individually and as the of The Estates of Margaret Ruth Willhoite and Michael Willhoite, and Jessie Gafeller, individually v. Genesis Health System, Dean A. Bunting, M.D., Joseph M. Phelan, M.D., Radiology Group, P.C., S.C., Steven D. Lamer, D.O., Tenille M. Miller, A.R.N.P.
── Patrick Willhoite, individually and as the of The Estates of Margaret Ruth Willhoite and Michael Willhoite, and Jessie Gafeller, individually v. Genesis Health System, Dean A. Bunting, M.D., Joseph M. Phelan, M.D., Radiology Group, P.C., S.C., Steven D. Lamer, D.O., Tenille M. Miller, A.R.N.P. ──
Court: Supreme Court of Iowa
Date: May 22, 2026
Category: General
In the Iowa Supreme Court
No. 24–1380
Submitted November 12, 2025—Filed May 22, 2026
Patrick Willhoite, individually and as the administrator of the Estate of
Margaret Ruth Willhoite and as the executor of the Estate of Michael
Willhoite, and Jessie Gafeller,
Appellants,
vs.
Genesis Health System, Dean A. Bunting, Joseph M. Phelan, Radiology
Group, P.C., S.C., Steven D. Lamer, Tenille M. Miller,
Appellees,
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Jeffrey C. McDaniel,
judge.
Two estates and two individuals appeal the dismissal of their medical
malpractice suit for failure to comply with Iowa Code section 147.140. The
defendants seek dismissal of the estates’ appeal because of defects in the filing
of the notice of appeal. Motion to Dismiss Appeal Denied; District Court
Judgment Affirmed.
May, J., delivered the opinion of the court as to parts I, II, and IV, in which
all participating justices joined, and announced the judgment of the court as to
part III. As to part III, Christensen, C.J., and McDonald and May, JJ., would
affirm; Mansfield, Oxley, and McDermott, JJ., would reverse. Waterman, J., took
no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Matthew G. Sease of Sease & Wadding, Des Moines, for appellants.
2
Connie L. Diekema, Jeffrey R. Kappelman, and Peter R. Lapointe of Finley
Law Firm, Des Moines, for appellee Lamer.
Christine L. Conover, Carrie L. Thompson, and Dawn M. Gibson of
Simmons Perrine Moyer Bergman PLC, Cedar Rapids, for appellees Phelan and
Radiology Group, P.C., S.C.
Jennifer E. Rinden and Graham R. Carl of Shuttleworth & Ingersoll, PLC,
Cedar Rapids, for appellee Bunting.
Frederick T. Harris, Ryan P. Tunink, and Andrew C. Johnson of Lamson
Dugan & Murray, LLP, West Des Moines, and John E. Hall, Jr., of Hall Booth
Smith, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for appellees Miller and Genesis Health System.
3
May, Justice.
Two estates and two individuals appeal the dismissal of their
wrongful-death medical malpractice suit. Our court must resolve two questions:
1. Should we dismiss the estates’ appeal because a non-attorney—who is
the executor for one estate and the administrator for the other—signed
and filed the estates’ notice of appeal?
2. Was the district court correct to dismiss the suit based on the plaintiffs’
failure to comply with Iowa Code section 147.140 (2020), our certificate
of merit affidavit statute?
We answer those questions as follows:
1. We unanimously agree that the estates’ appeal should not be
dismissed.
2. We are divided 3–3 as to whether the district court should have
dismissed the suit. Therefore, the dismissal is affirmed by operation of
law. Iowa Code § 602.4107 (2026); Juckette v. Iowa Utils. Bd.,
992 N.W.2d 218, 222 (Iowa 2023).
I. Factual and Procedural Background.
We start with facts alleged in the petition. In July 2016, Margaret Willhoite
was injured in a motor vehicle accident. She sought treatment at Genesis Medical
Center. She received an X-ray to determine whether there were any broken ribs.
Although the X-ray was negative for fractures, it indicated a nodule in her left
lung. And her medical records noted that she should receive a computerized
tomography (CT) scan of her chest to investigate the nodule. But no CT scan was
ordered or conducted. Margaret was released.
In March 2018, Margaret suffered a fracture to her left femur. She received
care at a different hospital. This time, a CT scan was performed. The scan
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}