All States › Oklahoma › Scott Jennings › Evidence
Neutral YouTube Link May 26, 2026

Emily Austin CAN’T HELP But HUMILIATE Herself Again in Heated Debate! [5:03-10:03]

And guys, where's Elon Musk? He did a Nazi salue and everything for those people. He's worth what? 400 billion? You understand how easily these pricks could pay for themselves and they still won't put up a damn penny for those morons. It's unbelievable who literally went to jail for Trump. I find the hilarious. They can all eat shit and live their miserable lives. Go ahead, storm the Capitol again for your daddy, Trump. Stupid ass sheep. And to this damn bottom, Trump said the bottom is a gift from him to America. A gift that we taxpayers have to pay for? Oh, thank you so much for the gift we had to buy ourselves that we never wanted. And what's even worse, we will never get the step foot in the damn ballroom. And it's only for Scott Jennings to show Trump his new tricks. Guys, Scott be tricking. You know that. I just think all of this is nonsense. It's over for Republicans and Trump. They aren't going to even try to do anything for their voters. It's the reason they did all these stupid redistricting. They knew very early on. They had no intentions of helping out the American people. So they're going to try to steal it. Push back on that a little bit where you call the slush fund. I find to call the anti-weaponization fund. And I'm sure on both sides of the aisle, we all have friends whose lives have been absolutely ruined, whether they were innocent. And you said that this is going to people who assaulted police officers on January 6th. It could, but the truth is, we don't know where this money's going yet. And I feel like we're always prematurely just and very negative when it comes to anything that President Trump wants to do. But I actually, I view this as something very important. Trump did not take the money and put it in his pocket. Like he could have. And like most people probably would have done. And it said he wants to help those people who were absolutely destroyed by the weaponization of the government. I have friends who declared bankruptcy over proving they're innocent that spent hundreds of thousands of dollars some millions to avoid spending time in jail and they don't get that money back. Why can't we help those people? Well, they realize the root of the problem. You just said the very simple fact that we're not going to know exactly who gets this money. I know that there was this testimony inside of the United States Congress in which they said that there's really no rules behind what's going to happen. So I think there's absolutely absurd that there's going to be a fund that's $1.8 billion. We don't know where the money's going to go through. And honestly, we don't know if we'll ever know who the money's going to go to. You don't think that that's absurd? That the president of the United States can create a fund and divvy payments to people and we don't know who the money goes to. I mean, we know that it's going to people who have been weaponized by the government. Now, whether that goes to, like you said, January 6, protesters or people like James Comey who I find is guilty, we don't know yet. So why don't we wait? It's a very early time to know where we are outrageous. We're going to give James Comey a payout for wrongful prosecution as we're trying to prosecute him. That doesn't seem to be the reason. That's the root of the issue. But the root of the issue is that we will never know. People in this country who have been wronged by the law have already had legal pathways to see justice for that. And what you said, Trump could have just taken the money. No, he can't just take the money because we live in a, yes, because I'm going to, I mean, I want to ask this question, yeah. Because Emily, you were saying Trump didn't benefit. What about this piece? Is other pieces? I don't meant with himself. About the outside of it. Well, I need to negotiate it with himself. That'll, that is the government. I want to ask about the IRS not being able to prosecute him or his family over taxes forever. What do you think about that? Obviously, optically, it looks horrendous. I think anybody can do that. It's a benefit to him. But there's also an unprecedented amount of persecution when it comes to the Trump and the Trump family. There has never been a, shut up, Emily. He's a crook log jaw. Is there anywhere in that 98% empty head of yours where maybe just maybe Trump is an effing crook? What else do they need to show you who he is? How many more rug pose does he have to do on his own supporters? Does he need to release another Trump phone to know that the guys are crook? Like, she's really the definition of a bimbo or pretending to be one. That's really what she's doing here. She just will not critique Trump. There is no wrong he can do because she knows her viewers would be pissed if she daresay the truth. The cultists will come out with their pitchforks and she will be gone before sundown. Republican voters know the truth about Trump. In fact, it's why they voted for him. They like that he's dirty. 100%. They have fascistic tendencies. They're okay with this. But these idiots on TV have to pretend it's something else. Trump deragement syndrome. He's just being mean. No real defense of anything because how do you defend this? You can't ever prosecute a guy on the IRS forever investigating him. That's not a benefit to him to this idiot. And again, I'm so sick of tired. Hey, how he's not benefiting when Trump is specifically giving this money to people who helped him with his insurrection.
Couch Politics · May 26, 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOMD4mHKtr8
Original link
Scott Jennings School Board Member Scott Jennings Council Member
Share on X Share on Facebook
← Back to Scott Jennings's profile
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own address as its source and its own type. #}