McNatt v. City of Albuquerque
── McNatt v. City of Albuquerque ──
Court: New Mexico Court of Appeals
Date: May 22, 2026
Category: General
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in
the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the
citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-
generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of
Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
No. A-1-CA-42938
ROY MCNATT,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE,
Defendant-Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY
Denise Barela Shepherd, District Court Judge
Roy McNatt
Albuquerque, NM
Pro Se Appellant
City of Albuquerque
Lauren Keefe, City Attorney
Ashlee M. Wright, Assistant City Attorney
Albuquerque, NM
for Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WRAY, Judge.
{1} Having reviewed Plaintiff Roy McNatt’s untimely motion for rehearing, the opinion
filed April 16, 2026 is hereby withdrawn and this opinion is substituted in its place. The
motion for rehearing is otherwise denied.
{2} In our calendar notice, we requested that in any response, Plaintiff must explain
why the district court’s decision was wrong, how the evidence that Plaintiff claimed was
not reviewed would have established compliance with the notice requirements in the
New Mexico Tort Claims Act, NMSA 1978, § 41-4-16(A) (1977), and how the record
established proper service under Rule 1-004(H) NMRA. [CN 2-3] While Plaintiff’s motion
for rehearing provides an explanation for late filings, we remain unpersuaded that
Plaintiff has demonstrated error by the district court. See Farmers, Inc. v. Dal Mach. &
Fabricating, Inc., 1990-NMSC-100, ¶ 8, 111 N.M. 6, 800 P.2d 1063 (“The presumption
upon review favors the correctness of the trial court’s actions. Appellant must
affirmatively demonstrate its assertion of error.”). We therefore affirm.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
KATHERINE A. WRAY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}