S.M. v. Department of Human Services
── S.M. v. Department of Human Services ──
Court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date: May 22, 2026
Category: General
RECORD IMPOUNDED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the
internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited . R. 1:36-3.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-2773-23
S.M.,1
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
SERVICES, DIVISION OF
FAMILY DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent-Respondent,
and
OCEAN COUNTY BOARD OF
SOCIAL SERVICES,
Respondent.
_____________________________
Submitted April 20, 2026 – Decided May 22, 2026
Before Judges Sabatino and Walcott-Henderson.
On appeal from the New Jersey Department of Human
Services, Division of Family Development, Docket No.
C092417015.
1
We use initials to protect the petitioner's privacy interests. R. 1:38-3(f)(4).
S.M., self-represented appellant.
Jennifer Davenport, Attorney General, attorney for
respondent (Sookie Bae-Park, Assistant Attorney
General, of counsel; Laura N. Morson, Deputy
Attorney General, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
Petitioner S.M., a self-represented litigant, appeals from a final agency
decision of the Department of Human Services, Division of Family
Development ("DFD"), adopting the initial decision of Administrative Law
Judge ("ALJ") Dean J. Buono, finding S.M. received an overpayment of
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ("SNAP") benefits in the amount of
$24,264.2 S.M. challenges DFD's determination, alleging various constitutional
due process and substantive flaws in the hearing before the ALJ and the Board's
reliance on the ALJ's initial determination. Discerning no abuse of discretion
or legal error by the Board, whose decision is supported by amply evidence in
the record, we affirm.
2
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program was established by Congress
in 1964, "to safeguard the health and well-being of the Nation's population by
raising levels of nutrition among low-income households." 7 U.S.C. § 2011;
N.J.A.C. 10:87-1.1. SNAP benefit eligibility is limited to households "whose
incomes and other financial resources, held singly or in joint ownership, are
determined to be a substantial limiting factor in permitting them to obtain a more
nutritious diet." 7 U.S.C. § 2014(a).
A-2773-23
2
I.
The following relevant facts are largely undisputed. This matter stems
from the Ocean County Board of Social Services' ("OCBSS") determination that
petitioner received an overpayment of SNAP benefits in the amount of $24,264.
Petitioner first applied and was approved for SNAP benefits in May 2017,
requiring her to complete financial information about her household income .
Petitioner resides in the same household with her husband, S.L., and is a
recipient of monthly benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs ("VA").
S.M. submitted applications for SNAP benefits annually, which required her to
update her household income and, relevant to these proceedings, between March
2017 and March 2019, S.M. reported S.L.'s VA benefits at $1,635 per month.3
According to the DFD, S.M. continued to report that income until May
2020 when she claimed that S.L.'s benefits had increased to $1,728. Three
months later, however, S.M. reported that S.L.'s income had in fact decreased to
$1,644, approximately ten dollars more than it wa
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}