Md. Military Department v. Harrington

── Md. Military Department v. Harrington ── Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland Date: May 22, 2026 Category: General Circuit Court for Baltimore County Case No. C-03-CV-25-001906 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MARYLAND Petition No. 10 September Term, 2026 MARYLAND MILITARY DEPARTMENT v. WAYNE HARRINGTON Fader, C.J., Watts, Booth, Biran, Gould, Eaves, Killough, JJ. PER CURIAM ORDER Filed: May 22, 2026 Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. 2026.05.22 '00'04- 14:13:12 Gregory Hilton, Clerk  IN THE * SUPREME COURT MARYLAND MILITARY * DEPARTMENT OF MARYLAND * Petition No. 10 v. * September Term, 2026 * (No. 2315, Sept. Term, 2025 WAYNE HARRINGTON Appellate Court of Maryland) * (Cir. Ct. No. C-03-CV-25-001906) * ORDER In the circuit court, the Maryland Military Department sought judicial review of the Office of Administrative Hearing’s April 3, 2025 order regarding the Department’s termination of an employee. After a hearing, the circuit court affirmed the order and remanded the matter for proceedings consistent with it. The Department, the petitioner, noted an appeal to the Appellate Court of Maryland, but did not file a Civil Appeal Information Report with the appeal. The Appellate Court notified the parties of the case number for the appeal and gave notice to petitioner that the civil appeal information report required by Rule 8-205(b) had not been filed and that failure to file the report within 15 days might result in the dismissal of the appeal. The Department did not file a civil appeal information report, and the appeal was dismissed on January 23, 2026. The petitioner then filed a petition for writ of certiorari and a motion for immediate remand to the Appellate Court. In the petition, the petitioner argues that the failure to file the civil appeal information report was the result of “excusable errors” by counsel, and that the petitioner was unable to make that case to the Appellate Court because that court no longer had jurisdiction over the appeal. Upon consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari, the response in opposition to the petition, the motion for immediate remand, and the record in this case, i