Melanie Corinne Ritter v. Linda Broadwell Kirby Ritter
── Melanie Corinne Ritter v. Linda Broadwell Kirby Ritter ──
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date: May 20, 2026
Author: PITMAN
Category: General
Judgment rendered May 20, 2026.
Application for rehearing may be filed
within the delay allowed by Art. 2166,
La. C.C.P.
No. 56,860-CA
COURT OF APPEAL
SECOND CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA
*****
MELANIE CORINNE RITTER, ET AL Plaintiffs-Appellants
versus
LINDA BROADWELL KIRBY RITTER Defendant-Appellee
*****
Appealed from the
Fifth Judicial District Court for the
Parish of Richland, Louisiana
Trial Court No. 49666-C
Honorable Stephen Gayle Dean, Judge
*****
LAW OFFICE OF ANTHONY J.
BRUSCATO Counsel for Plaintiffs-
By: Anthony J. Bruscato Appellants, Melanie
Corinne Ritter and
Deborah Louise Ritter
BENJAMIN F. MARSHALL, IV &
ASSOCIATES Counsel for Defendant-
By: Benjamin F. Marshall, IV Appellee
*****
Before PITMAN, HUNTER, AND MARCOTTE, JJ.
MARCOTTE, J
This civil appeal arises from the Fifth Judicial District Court, Parish of
Richland, the Honorable Stephen G. Dean presiding. Plaintiffs, Melanie
Corinne Ritter (“Melanie”) and Deborah Louise Ritter (“Deborah”),
daughters of the decedent, and Thomas Clifton Ritter (“Mr. Ritter”), appeal
the trial court’s judgment granting an exception of no right of action filed by
defendant, Linda Broadwell Kirby Ritter (“Linda”), the surviving spouse of
the decedent. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This matter arises out of a dispute over ownership interests in a 360-
acre tract of land in Richland Parish, Louisiana (the “subject property”).
Mr. Ritter conveyed his interest in the subject property to Linda via
quitclaim deed dated August 9, 2016, and recorded in the Richland Parish
conveyance records on October 2, 2018.
Mr. Ritter died on October 4, 2018, leaving a will in notarial form
dated August 9, 2016, which named Linda as his sole legatee. Specifically,
Mr. Ritter’s will provided that he bequeathed to his wife “all [his] property,
both real and personal, of whatever kind or nature, and wherever situated to
have and to hold in full and complete ownership.”
Melanie and Deborah were not named in his will. A succession was
filed in Ouachita Parish in which Linda was recognized as the sole legatee of
the decedent, and all the decedent’s property, both separate and community,
was conveyed to her by way of a judgment of possession signed January 6,
2019.
On April 26, 2024, Melanie and Deborah filed a petition asserting an
ownership interest in the subject property. The defendant responded by
asserting exceptions of vagueness, no cause of action, and prescription. On
February 26, 2025, the trial court granted the exception of vagueness and
permitted plaintiffs 15 days to file an amended petition clarifying their
position.
On March 25, 2025, Melanie and Deborah filed an amended petition
asserting that the quit claim deed was in fact a “donation in disguise” and
ineffective because Linda was not identified and because it was not accepted
during the lifetime of the decedent.
On April 7, 2025, Linda filed peremptory exceptions of no cause of
action, no right of action, and prescription. She claimed that even if the quit
claim deed was not in proper form, the subject property duly passed to her as
the sole, universal legatee of the decedent’s pro
← Back to Marcus L. Hunter's profile
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}