State of Idaho v. Terry Angelo DeLonnie

── State of Idaho v. Terry Angelo DeLonnie ── Court: Idaho Court of Appeals Date: May 13, 2026 Category: General IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket Nos. 52849, 52850, & 52851 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Filed: May 13, 2026 Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) Melanie Gagnepain, Clerk v. ) ) THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED TERRY ANGELO DELONNIE, ) OPINION AND SHALL NOT ) BE CITED AS AUTHORITY Defendant-Appellant. ) ) Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Canyon County. Hon. Randall S. Grove, District Judge. Orders revoking probation and execution of suspended sentences, affirmed; judgment of conviction and determinate sentence of fifteen years for failure to register as a sexual offender and being a persistent violator, affirmed. Erik R. Lehtinen, State Appellate Public Defender; Kiley A. Heffner, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Raúl R. Labrador, Attorney General; Kacey L. Jones, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. ________________________________________________ Before TRIBE, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge; and LORELLO, Judge ________________________________________________ PER CURIAM In Docket No. 52849, Angelo Delonnie pled guilty to sexual abuse of a minor under sixteen years of age. I.C. § 18-1506. In Docket No. 52850, Delonnie pled guilty to two counts of possession of sexually exploitative material. I.C. § 18-15057(2)(a). In exchange for his guilty pleas, additional charges were dismissed. The district court sentenced Delonnie to a unified term of twenty-five years, with a minimum period of confinement of four years, for sexual abuse of a minor under sixteen years, and to concurrent unified terms of ten years, with minimum periods of confinement of six years, for the two counts of possession of sexually exploitative material. The 1 district court ordered that Delonnie’s sentences in both of these cases be served concurrently. The district court retained jurisdiction and sent Delonnie to participate in the rider program. Following completion of his rider, the district court suspended the sentences and placed Delonnie on probation. In Docket No. 52851, Delonnie was charged with and later pled guilty to failure to register as a sexual offender, I.C. § 18-8309, and admitted to being a persistent violator, I.C. § 19-2514. In exchange for his guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed. The State filed petitions for probation violation in Docket Nos. 52849 and 52850, to which Delonnie admitted. At the sentencing/probation disposition hearing, Delonnie requested that the district court revoke his probation, but reduce his sentence in Docket No. 52849. Delonnie also requested that the district court revoke his probation and order execution of his sentences in Docket No. 52850. The district court revoked Delonnie’s probation and ordered execution of his original sentences without modification. With regard to Delonnie’s sentence in Docket No. 52851, the district court sentenced him to a determinate term of fifteen years, to be served consecutively to his other two sentences. Delonnie appeals and makes the following arguments. In Docket No. 52849, Delonnie does not challenge the district court’s decision to revoke probation but argues that the district court should have reduced his sentence upon revocation of probation. In Docket No. 52851, Delonnie argues that his sentence is excessive. Sentencing