DERON KING v. CITY OF EAST POINT
── DERON KING v. CITY OF EAST POINT ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date: May 21, 2026
Category: General
FIRST DIVISION
BARNES, P. J.,
MARKLE and HODGES, JJ.
NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be
physically received in our clerk’s office within ten
days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.
https://www.gaappeals.us/rules
May 21, 2026
In the Court of Appeals of Georgia
A26A0836. KING v. CITY OF EAST POINT et al.
HODGES, Judge.
This case arises out of the termination of an employee following the publication
of statements regarding his alleged involvement in a cyber-attack on the City of East
Point’s email system. Deron King, the employee, sued the City of East Point, Mayor
Deana Holiday-Ingraham, as an individual and in her official capacity, City
Councilmember and Mayor Pro Tem Karen Rene, as an individual and in her official
capacity, and seven fictitious defendants as unidentified councilmembers (collectively
“the defendants”). The defendants filed a motion in the trial court to enforce a
settlement agreement reached by the parties, and the trial court granted the
defendants’ motion. King appeals from that order. For the reasons that follow, we
affirm the trial court’s decision.
This Court conducts a de novo review of the trial court’s order on a motion to
enforce a settlement agreement. DeRossett Enters. v. Gen. Elec. Cap. Corp., 275 Ga.
App. 728 (621 SE2d 755) (2005). In doing so, we view the evidence in the light most
favorable to the nonmoving party. Id.
So viewed, the record shows that in September 2021, the City of East Point
experienced a cyber-attack on its email system. The City Manager at the time
indicated that the IT Department was investigating the cyber-attack, but chose not to
inform the public about it. Thereafter, in January 2022, King was appointed as the
City Manager. On August 8, 2023, Holiday-Ingraham informed the public about the
2021 cyber-attack and indicated that a private forensic auditing firm would be hired
to investigate. On August 21, 2023, Fox 5 News Atlanta published an article stating
that taxpayers were calling for King to resign or be terminated after the City
purportedly disclosed that the “audit revealed the [C]ity lost more than $700,000 in
an email scam, and ... King knew about it, but didn’t tell the council or taxpayers.” In
December 2023, King was terminated by the City.
2
The month after his termination, King made an initial demand for settlement
to the City for its failure to comply with the terms of his employment contract. After
several failed exchanges to negotiate a settlement, King served an ante litem notice on
the City, and on August 15, 2024, King sued the defendants. In his complaint, King
asserted that the defendants failed to comply with the terms of his employment
contract, committed defamation per se, and negligently failed to “set the record
straight” regarding the “false inference that [he] bore some responsibility or engaged
in some dereliction of duty regarding the 2021 cyber-attack[.]”
On September 12, 2024, the defendants’ counsel reached out to King’s counsel
to introduce themselves. The defendants’ counsel subsequently emailed King’s
counsel on October 7, 2024, stating that they “spoke[] to the City Attorney regarding
[the] prior settlement discussions, and [they] would like to discuss the same.” On
October 9, 2024, counsel for both parties spoke on the phone and corresponded
regarding the time it would take to get the City’s board to meet and finalize a press
statement. On October 18, 2024, King’s counsel emailed the defendants’ counsel
requesting particular language for the press release and reimbursement of attorney
fees. The defendants’ counsel responded on October 22, 2024, indicating that the
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}