Shoffner v. State
── Shoffner v. State ──
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date: May 19, 2026
Category: General
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court
Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the
opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any
prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and
official text of the opinion.
In the
Supreme Court of Georgia
No. S26A0529
Anthony Douglas Shoffner Jr.
v.
The State
On Appeal from the Superior Court of Houston County
No. 2022C0057524A
Decided: May 19, 2026
BETHEL, Justice.
A jury found Anthony Douglas Shoffner Jr. guilty of malice
murder and related crimes in connection with the stabbing deaths
of his mother Rebecca Griffin and stepfather Kenneth Griffin. 1
1 The crimes occurred on March 11, 2020. In October 2020, a Houston
County grand jury indicted Shoffner for malice murder (Counts 1 and 2), felony
murder predicated on aggravated assault (Counts 3 and 4), aggravated assault
with a knife (Counts 5 and 6), and possession of a knife during the commission
of a felony (Counts 7 and 8). In March 2022, Shoffner was reindicted for the
same eight counts, as well as an additional count of aggravated assault against
a third victim (Count 9). Count 9 was nolle prossed before trial. A June 2022
jury trial ended in a mistrial. Shoffner was retried the following week, and the
jury found him guilty of all counts. The trial court sentenced Shoffner to serve
consecutive sentences of life in prison without the possibility of parole on
Counts 1 and 2 and a consecutive 5 years’ imprisonment on each of Counts 7
and 8. The remaining counts merged or were vacated by operation of law.
Shoffner timely filed a motion for new trial, which was subsequently
amended through new counsel. Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial
court entered an order denying Shoffner’s motion for new trial, as amended, on
September 22, 2025. Shoffner timely filed a notice of appeal, and his appeal
On appeal, Shoffner argues that the evidence was not sufficient
as a matter of constitutional due process to support his
convictions, that the trial court erred by denying his motions to
suppress and for mistrial, and that trial counsel was
constitutionally ineffective. For the reasons that follow,
Shoffner’s claims fail, so we affirm.
1. Viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdicts,
the evidence presented at trial showed the following. On the
morning of March 11, 2020, Kenneth and Rebecca Griffin were
found stabbed to death inside their apartment. Earlier that
morning, a maintenance worker at the Griffins’ apartment
complex had observed Shoffner walking the Griffins’ two dogs
and, later, leaving with the dogs in Kenneth’s maroon Jeep.
Shortly after, Shoffner abandoned the dogs at a local pet store.
Shoffner then visited a gaming store and sold various pieces of
Kenneth’s gaming equipment.
Shoffner proceeded to drive to a nearby apartment
complex, where he chased a maintenance worker while wielding
a baseball bat, struck the worker with the bat, and accused the
worker of sexual assault. Shoffner then went to a local pharmacy
where he verbally assaulted one of the store’s patrons, leading the
manager to call 911. Upon arrival, police pla
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}