Bank Ozk v. Robert L. Tanner, as Trustee of the Robert L. Tanner Revocable Trust Dated August 19, 1994
── Bank Ozk v. Robert L. Tanner, as Trustee of the Robert L. Tanner Revocable Trust Dated August 19, 1994 ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date: May 20, 2026
Category: General
Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 339
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION IV
No. CV-23-814
BANK OZK Opinion Delivered May 20, 2026
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM THE BOONE
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
V. [NO. 05CV-18-214]
ROBERT L. TANNER, AS TRUSTEE OF HONORABLE JOHNNIE A.
THE ROBER L. TANNER REVOCABLE COPELAND, JUDGE
TRUST DATED AUGUST 19, 1994;
AND TANNER FAMILY, LLC, ON AFFIRMED
BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL
OTHER TAXPAYERS SIMILARLY
SITUATED; OZARK MOUNTAIN
SOLID WASTE DISTRICT; BOONE
COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR AMY
JENKINS; ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; AND
LESLIE RUTLEDGE, ARKANSAS
ATTORNEY GENERAL
APPELLEES
WENDY SCHOLTENS WOOD, Judge
Boone County taxpayers successfully challenged an $18 charge that was added to their
ad valorem tax bills in 2018. The purpose of the $18 charge was to repay bonds issued to the
Ozark Mountain Solid Waste District (the “OMSWD”). 1 In this appeal, Bank OZK
1
The OMSWD provided trash-disposal services to Baxter, Boone, Carroll, Marion,
Newton, and Searcy Counties, and there were illegal-exaction lawsuits in each of those
counties.
challenges a garnishment order resulting from the illegal-exaction order entered by the
Boone County Circuit Court. We affirm.
As explained in Summers v. Bank OZK, 2026 Ark. App. 352, ___ S.W.3d ___, which
is also handed down today, Bank OZK filed a complaint in the Pulaski County Circuit Court
for the appointment of a receiver over OMSWD in December 2014. A consent order was
entered in May 2015 appointing a receiver. In April 2017, the Pulaski County Circuit Court
entered an order approving the receiver’s report that recommended OMSWD assess the $18
charge and instructing the receiver to cause the Boone County tax collector to deposit the
proceeds from the charge into an account with Bank OZK annually so that Bank OZK could
act as a payment agent.
Boone County taxpayers filed their illegal-exaction lawsuit in the Boone County
Circuit Court on May 18, 2018. During the pendency of the litigation, the Boone County
Circuit Court entered an order finding that Bank OZK was a necessary party, and the
taxpayers added the bank as a defendant. Bank OZK moved to dismiss, arguing that it was
not a necessary party because “complete relief can be granted among the original parties to
this litigation.” Bank OZK also argued, “Further, all proper claims related to this
determination can be resolved without [Bank OZK], and [Bank OZK’s] absence will not
impair this determination nor leave any other party subject to a substantial risk of incurring
multiple or inconsistent obligations.” On December 17, 2021, the Boone County Circuit
Court granted Bank OZK’s motion to dismiss.
2
In a different order also entered on December 17, the Boone County Circuit Court
held that the $18 charge was an illegal exaction. The order stated that “[a]ny payments of the
$18.00 collected by the Tax Collector or Boone County Treasurer . . . prior to or subsequent
to this Order, if any, should be paid into the Registry of the Boone County Circuit Clerk.”
No party appealed this order. At the time, Bank OZK had already filed the motion for
interpleader in the Pulaski County Circuit Court receivership action discussed in Summers,
and that court had granted the relief.
The Boone County taxpayers served a writ of garnishment on Bank OZK on June 10,
2022. The day before, the Pulaski County Circuit Court had entered an order finding that
none of the six county courts, including the Boone County Circuit Court, had jurisdiction
to determine
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}