Dedric Patterson v. State of Arkansas
── Dedric Patterson v. State of Arkansas ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date: May 20, 2026
Category: General
Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 325
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION III
No. CR-25-613
Opinion Delivered: May 20, 2026
DEDRIC PATTERSON
APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CRAWFORD
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. 17CR-24-45]
V.
HONORABLE CANDICE A. SETTLE,
STATE OF ARKANSAS JUDGE
APPELLEE
REBRIEFING ORDERED; MOTION TO
WITHDRAW DENIED
CASEY R. TUCKER, Judge
This is a no-merit appeal filed on behalf of Dedric Patterson following the circuit
court’s revocation of his probation. Patterson’s counsel filed a timely notice of appeal
followed by a no-merit brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and
Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(b) (2023), along with a motion to be relieved as counsel
asserting that there is no issue of arguable merit on appeal. The clerk of the court mailed
Patterson a copy of counsel’s no-merit brief and was advised he had thirty days from the
date the brief was filed to file pro se points for reversal. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(b)(2).
Appellant provided no pro se points for reversal, so the State filed no response. We deny
counsel’s motion to withdraw and order rebriefing.
In October 2024, Patterson entered a negotiated guilty plea to the crime of third-
degree domestic battery second offense, a Class D felony. He was given a sentence of 120
twenty days in the Crawford County Detention Center with an additional five years of
probation subject to certain conditions of behavior. The State filed a petition to revoke on
March 11, 2025, and an amended petition to revoke on June 3 in which the State alleged
that Patterson violated the terms of his probation and more specifically stated:
That as of March 11, 2025, the Defendant had failed to abide by the terms
and conditions of probation by failing to report to the probation office,
failing to provide proof of employment or education enrollment, failed to
provide a valid residence and is delinquent in supervision fees in the amount
of $70. That as of June 3, 2025, the Defendant has failed to make any
payments towards his fines, costs and fees leaving an unpaid balance of
$3,400. Said conduct is in violation of the terms and conditions of his
probation/suspended sentence and the Order of this Court.
The revocation hearing was conducted on June 17. Deborah Martin, the financial
coordinator for the Crawford County prosecutor’s office, testified that Patterson had failed
to pay the $2,500 fine, $150 court costs, $40 booking fee, and $250 DNA fee he agreed to
pay as a condition of his probation. Martin testified that Patterson agreed to pay $65 a
month towards these fees, fines and costs beginning on March 3, 2025, but Patterson failed
to make any payments. Daisy Lear, the parole and probation officer assigned to Patterson’s
case, testified that Patterson never reported for intake, failed to provide a valid address and
proof of employment, and never paid the $105 supervision fee due at the time of the
revocation hearing. Since Lear had no contact information for Patterson, a petition to
revoke was filed.
During closing remarks, the State asked the court “to revoke him, give him the six
years, satisfy the fines and costs, and send him on his way.” Patterson’s counsel requested
2
leniency in sentencing given it was his first felony offense, and the sentencing guidelines
allow “CCC[1] or alternative sentencing.” Patterson’s counsel asked that he be
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}