United States v. Brandon Jennings
── United States v. Brandon Jennings ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date: May 20, 2026
Category: General
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6803 Doc: 40 Filed: 05/20/2026 Pg: 1 of 8
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6803
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BRANDON MARQUIS JENNINGS, a/k/a Smilez, a/k/a Smilez Finesse, a/k/a
Beezy, a/k/a Mustafa Bey,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:18-cr-00318-FL-1)
Submitted: April 14, 2026 Decided: May 20, 2026
Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Richard Croutharmel, THE LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD
CROUTHARMEL, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Michael F. Easley, Jr., United
States Attorney, David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, Kristine L. Fritz,
Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6803 Doc: 40 Filed: 05/20/2026 Pg: 2 of 8
PER CURIAM:
In 2020, Brandon Marquis Jennings was convicted, following a four-day jury trial,
of two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion; two counts of sex trafficking
of a minor; manufacture and production of child pornography; interstate transportation of
a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity; three counts of interstate
transportation for prostitution by coercion and enticement; three counts of interstate
transportation for prostitution; and use of the internet to promote an unlawful business
enterprise, namely prostitution, and aiding and abetting. Jennings’s convictions arose from
his sex trafficking of multiple victims and coercion of them to engage in prostitution. The
district court sentenced him to concurrent terms of life imprisonment, and this court
affirmed the judgment on direct appeal.
In 2023, the Government moved for a protective order, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1514(b), to prohibit Jennings from contacting two victims who testified at his trial, one
of whom was T.C., and requested an evidentiary hearing. In support of its motion, the
Government included an affidavit from Department of Homeland Security Special Agent
M.C. Glenn Covington, the case agent and lead investigator in Jennings’s original criminal
prosecution; excerpts of T.C.’s trial testimony; a screenshot of threatening text messages
Jennings sent to T.C. in 2016; and Jennings’s December 2021 letter to Assistant United
States Attorney Blondel, the prosecutor in Jennings’s criminal case.
T.C.’s testimony at Jennings’s criminal trial recounted that, although she initially
thought she and Jennings had a romantic relationship, he soon began prostituting her, using
Backpage and Craigslist to solicit clients, and retaining her earnings. While T.C. worked
2
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6803 Doc: 40 Filed: 05/20/2026 Pg: 3 of 8
for Jennings, he repeatedly physically abused her, threatened to kill her and harm her
children, and deprived her of food and sleep. T.C. testified that, when she attempted to
leave Jennings, he beat her to the point that she lost consciousness, leaving her with
bleeding in her brain and cracked ribs
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}