United States v. Ortiz
── United States v. Ortiz ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date: May 20, 2026
Category: Direct Criminal
Case: 24-11032 Document: 123-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/20/2026
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
____________ United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 24-11032 May 20, 2026
____________
Lyle W. Cayce
United States of America, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Raynaldo Rivera Ortiz, Jr.,
Defendant—Appellant.
______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:22-CR-378-1
______________________________
Before Richman, Higginson, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
A jury found Raynaldo Rivera Ortiz, Jr. guilty of five counts of
tampering with a consumer product in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1365(a) and
five counts of adulteration of a drug in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(k) and
333(b)(7). Dr. Ortiz challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the
verdict, certain of the district court’s evidentiary rulings, and an allegedly
improper comment by the Government during closing argument. We affirm.
_____________________
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 24-11032 Document: 123-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/20/2026
No. 24-11032
I
Raynaldo Rivera Ortiz, Jr. (Dr. Ortiz) was as an anesthesiologist in
Dallas, Texas. 1 He rendered his services through two of his own medical
businesses, 2 which also employed several other providers. 3 Dr. Ortiz
practiced at various facilities throughout the area, including Baylor Scott and
White Surgicare North Dallas (Surgicare). 4 Surgicare is “an ambulatory
surgical center,” meaning that patients come in for “low risk surgeries” and
usually leave on the same day. 5
During the summer of 2022, Surgicare experienced several unusual
complications. 6 Between May 2022 and August 2022, Surgicare transferred
fourteen patients 7 to a hospital for a higher level of care. 8 Patients who were
transferred had “hypertensive episodes (extreme high blood
pressures) . . . [that Surgicare’s patients] had not experienced in the past.” 9
These hypertensive episodes “would cause cardiac issues,” 10 making
transfer necessary.
_____________________
1
ROA.54.
2
See ROA.2157-58.
3
See ROA.2183, 2186-87.
4
See ROA.2168, 2190.
5
ROA.1497.
6
See ROA.1525 (Burks, Surgicare’s administrator, ROA.1497, testifying that she
recalled “a string of unusual complications during surgeries” at Surgicare).
7
ROA.1526.
8
ROA.1525.
9
ROA.1525.
10
ROA.1527.
2
Case: 24-11032 Document: 123-1 Page: 3 Date Filed: 05/20/2026
No. 24-11032
Surgicare reviewed the fourteen transfer cases for potential causes of
the patients’ complications 11 because the number of transfers was higher than
normal, compared to the five total patients transferred in the
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}