All States › Maryland › Montgomery County › Jamie Raskin › Evidence
Neutral YouTube Link May 20, 2026

Tara Setmayer DROPS A B*MB on MAGA Pundits in Explosive Debate! [10:02-15:04]

about the military. That's all that was said. That was considered traitors. And what a deaf penalties for them. But giving money to actual traitors who tried to overthrow an election they literally went there. If they got a hold of any Democrats, we all know what would have happened without a doubt in my mind they would have killed them. Could you imagine they got a hold of AOC? Could you imagine that? Like, guys, these people are literal definitions of what it means to be a traitor. And not only do they all get these pardons, but all of them, even the ones that beat the living crap out of cops, now they're going to be getting money as well because JD Vance and acting attorney general Todd Blanche refused to say that they won't get any of the money. There's no excusing this. You are also a traitor by extension by defending this crap. But damn, Tara, she dropped the bomb, guys. She got the nuclear bomb, guys. I think this war's over. Totional. Absolutely. And I'm glad to see Jamie Raskin and the Democrats are going to challenge. Yeah, it is Congress who gets the power of the person they cannot adjudicate this amount of money like that. It's also, I think there's a question on that. I think it is not no coincidence that they posted this addendum that the DOJ posted this addendum after Todd Blanche had his hearing today in front of Congress because he didn't want to answer questions on this because it just instincts to holy hell. And this is, again, this is coming at a time when Americans can't afford gas, can't afford groceries, are canceling summer vacations. Farmers are going bankrupt, but we are settling with Donald Trump to the tunes of billions that we're saying you are above the law. He's not getting any of the money. I'm glad that everyone's calling all of us around this table. All of us around this table could be audited by EIS. All of us. Sure. But Donald Trump can. Yeah, for taking something from him. For sure what he is absolutely. And his family. And his family. It's not this point forward. Yeah, right. It's his family. Hold my hand. All of his, and all of my evidence of his business. Lydia, go ahead. No, I'm glad that everyone's up in arms about slush funds. I mean, Biden had $350 in a COVID fund that he appointed to $150 billion. There were about $20 billion. This robot is completely broken. She needs an update to her system. She cannot stop bringing up Biden. What an effing maniac. I'm just possible. Line that NGOs. I mean, I'm not a fan of slush funds. Are you really? Are you glad that you're, I'm glad that you're out of reach out about a billion. I was also outraged about. OK, Biden's not for $100 billion. Biden's not for $100 million. Justify this. Let's stay on topic. Justify this. You're OK with this. You think this is an honorable use of taxpayer dollars? This is how you do it. So look, I think, I think the law, I don't answer to you. I don't think the American people go ahead. I'm asking you a simple question. All right, millions of people watching right now answer to them. What is it? I do not care. Thank you very much. So the law, the law, you can't say yes or no. It's crazy. I can't answer the question. What do you think? So is this the right thing to do? I think it's important to acknowledge the law fair that Trump and hundreds of people experienced under the last administration, staffers, people who were blacklisted, Trump spent tens of millions of, so the law fair is a serious issue. And I think it makes sense that there would be some sort of restitution, given that this ruined people's lives. I am not sure that this is the best vehicle to make that habit. Oh, for the love of life. Did we all agree? Guys, I watched a live massacre. Holy shit, Tara set my eyes. She deserves a standing ovation. This is how you do it. Guys, this is how you do it. You corner them. You see how she was stammering to the point and the host, great job on the host, to force her to answer the question. Unbelievable. It's a good job. Three that we are against the slush fund in Congress that pays out taxpayer money to people who make claims on sexual assault, sexual harassment and claim, and we have no transparency. We don't know who it goes to, right? That is horrific. OK, it is horrific. But that's not true. It is also equally horrific. It is equally horrific. That there will be no transparency to this alleged fund that it is being done unconstitutionally because Congress has the power of the purse that it is given Donald Trump a carte blanche to do whatever, and his family, to do whatever the hell he wants and that it is being negotiated by his personal lawyer with his personal lawyer who is now the acting secretary at Attorney General. It is disgusting. It is, and at a time when Americans can't afford shit and let's not act like it's not about January 6th,
Couch Politics · May 20, 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BR3EcSWzhfI
Original link
Jamie Raskin U.S. Representative
Share on X Share on Facebook
← Back to Jamie Raskin's profile
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own address as its source and its own type. #}