People v. Grayes CA4/2

── People v. Grayes CA4/2 ── Court: California Court of Appeal Date: May 19, 2026 Category: General Filed 5/19/26 P. v. Grayes CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, E083879 v. (Super.Ct.No. FWV22003252) LASHAY CHANNEL GRAYES, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION Defendant and Appellant. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] THE COURT The opinion filed in this matter on May 8, 2026, is modified as follows: On page 1, the name of the trial court judge is added to the existing sentencing judge’s name, to read as follows: Shannon L. Faherty (trial judge) and Michael A. Camber (sentencing judge), Judges.  This modification does not change the judgment. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS FIELDS J. We concur: RAMIREZ P. J. RAPHAEL J. 2 Filed 5/8/26 P. v. Grayes CA4/2 (unmodified opinion) NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, E083879 v. (Super.Ct.No. FWV22003252) LASHAY CHANNEL GRAYES, OPINION Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Michael A. Camber, Judge. Reversed with directions. Matthew Aaron Lopas, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Charles C. Ragland, Assistant Attorney General, Christopher P. Beesley and Britton B. Lacy, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.  I. INTRODUCTION In February 2022, police officers were dispatched to a medical office to respond to a report of vandalism. When the officers arrived at the scene, they encountered defendant and appellant Lashay Channel Grayes, and a physical altercation ensued when the officers attempted to arrest defendant. As a result of this incident, defendant was convicted by a jury of one count of obstructing or resisting an executive officer (count 1; Pen. Code, § 69)1 and one count of resisting, obstructing, or delaying a peace officer (count 2; § 148, subd. (a)). Defendant appeals, arguing that the evidence at trial was insufficient to show that officers were lawfully performing a duty at the time of her arrest based up