All States › Evidence
Neutral Court Opinion May 20, 2026

People v. Zacarias CA4/2

── People v. Zacarias CA4/2 ── Court: California Court of Appeal Date: May 19, 2026 Category: General Filed 5/19/26 P. v. Zacarias CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, E084610 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF1903932) OSVALDO ZACARIAS, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION Defendant and Appellant. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] THE COURT The opinion filed in this matter on May 8, 2026, is modified as follows: On page 1, “Affirmed with directions” is modified to read: “Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded with directions.” On page 19, the following sentence is added between the first and second sentence of the Disposition: “The matter is remanded with directions to the trial court to dismiss that prior enhancement and to prepare an amended abstract of judgment and forward it to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.” 1 The Disposition, therefore, should read as follows: “The prior serious felony enhancement based on the May 31, 1990 conviction for shooting at an occupied vehicle or dwelling is vacated. The matter is remanded with directions to the trial court to dismiss that prior enhancement and to prepare an amended abstract of judgment and forward it to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.” This modification does not change the judgment. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS FIELDS J. We concur: MILLER Acting P. J. RAPHAEL J. 2 Filed 5/8/26 P. v. Zacarias CA4/3 (unmodified opinion) NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, E084610 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF1903932) OSVALDO ZACARIAS, OPINION Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Samah Shouka, Judge. Affirmed with directions. Theresa Osterman Stevenson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Charles C. Ragland, Assistant Attorney General, Christopher P. Beesley and Kristen Kinnai
CourtListener · May 19, 2026
Original link
Share on X Share on Facebook
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own address as its source and its own type. #}