People v. Zacarias CA4/2
── People v. Zacarias CA4/2 ──
Court: California Court of Appeal
Date: May 19, 2026
Category: General
Filed 5/19/26 P. v. Zacarias CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E084610
v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF1903932)
OSVALDO ZACARIAS, ORDER MODIFYING
OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
THE COURT
The opinion filed in this matter on May 8, 2026, is modified as follows:
On page 1, “Affirmed with directions” is modified to read: “Affirmed in part,
vacated in part, and remanded with directions.”
On page 19, the following sentence is added between the first and second sentence
of the Disposition: “The matter is remanded with directions to the trial court to dismiss
that prior enhancement and to prepare an amended abstract of judgment and forward it to
the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.”
1
The Disposition, therefore, should read as follows:
“The prior serious felony enhancement based on the May 31, 1990 conviction for
shooting at an occupied vehicle or dwelling is vacated. The matter is remanded with
directions to the trial court to dismiss that prior enhancement and to prepare an amended
abstract of judgment and forward it to the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.”
This modification does not change the judgment.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
FIELDS
J.
We concur:
MILLER
Acting P. J.
RAPHAEL
J.
2
Filed 5/8/26 P. v. Zacarias CA4/3 (unmodified opinion)
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E084610
v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF1903932)
OSVALDO ZACARIAS, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Samah Shouka, Judge.
Affirmed with directions.
Theresa Osterman Stevenson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for
Defendant and Appellant.
Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney
General, Charles C. Ragland, Assistant Attorney General, Christopher P. Beesley and
Kristen Kinnai
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}