Cowboys LINKED To Nick Chubb Signing By ESPN | Dallas Cowboys Rumors [5:00-10:01]

your bounds and assists tonight and Jalen Brunson, more than nine and a half feel goals made. Those two, I think there's a bunch of great defenders on the guard spot for either of those teams really. That is a two-pick power play, 3x, the payout on that one. Prize picks now has really payouts by the way. Player gets off to a hot start. You have the option to cash out those winnings before the game, even finishes. New user offer, download the prize picks, aptly in the comments in the description. Use code HMA to get 50 bucks in lineups after you play your first $5 lineup. That's code HMA to get 50 bucks in lineups after you play your first $5 lineup. Prize picks. It's good to be right. Here are some of the advanced stats for Nick Chubbs. I mean, we got a couple different options here. This is R-Y-O-E. That's rush yards, over expected, which is NFL's next chance stats attempt to like, hey, this is how it fits from a, you know, we're balancing it with what the offensive line is giving you as best as they can. Yards after contact for Kerry was 3.3. That's 23rd, 28th. EPA for Kerry, expected points added, 39th. Explosive runs was 9.45th out of the only 48 eligible backs, which Chubb was on the lower end of the eligible back. So, you know, do keep that in mind. Success rate, though. It's extremely low, 34.4%. The Texans, the past couple years, though, as an offense, especially on the ground, have been a little bit fester famine overall. So, there is some team elements here for all of this. They compare these numbers to Malik Davis's advanced stats, also acknowledging he did not qualify, but you couldn't kind of plug in the rough estimations there. Not as good as the rush yards over expected, but better yards after contact, significantly better EPA per Kerry. If we do explosive runs on a rate basis, better, because again, it's about a third of the carries, and the success rate was also significantly higher. Now, again, it is a small sample size. So, you know, as you do a bigger sample size, typically, the efficiency numbers do tend to drop. The second claim there from Apple was that Nick Chubb is still good in short yardage, and he does have, I think, the power. The results, though, are maybe a little bit iffyier than what you'd prefer. These are inside these carries between one and three yards to go per pro football reference, by the way. 22 carries are very nice 69 yards, 12 first downs. If you're at 55-ish percent is normally a pretty decent, like, clip of, like, I would call that a successful run, because if you need three yards, like, you should be able to get three yards, essentially, 20 carries, 40 yards, four carries, nine yards, 20-22 was absurd. 39 carries for 195 yards, seven touchdowns, 24 first downs. He was awesome, like, because again, he was arguably the second football in 22, like those numbers certainly check out. Let's compare those numbers, then, to Javante Williams and Malik Davis, like Davis, 50 percent first downs on those 10 carries, two touchdowns, really good 5.6 average, small sample size, had, like, the one big run there, really. Javante, meanwhile, 2.7 average isn't particularly great. Eight touchdowns, though, is awesome. He was very good on the goal line, and 32 first downs. That is the exact same average success rate, or if we want to call it a first down rate, if we want to call it that way, which, I think, does include touchdowns, by the way, as that 2022 campaign from Nick Chubb is pretty good. So especially with Javante Williams, I think you had better options here, like, maybe 50-50 argue however you want to argue there with Nick Chubb, but, or with Malik Davis, but I kind of lean towards Javante just being better in those areas. The things I think you would use Nick Chubb for, rather use Javante for. So on the Cowboys running back-toff chart, where would your rank Nick Chubb? Let me know in the comment section of today's show. I would bet most of the votes on that are going to come in 2, 3, maybe the occasional 4, so can Nick Chubb be the number 3 option? If we are only judging this based on, hey, rank just the best running backs in the NFL, I think he's better than most number 3 options. That does not mean, however, he is a good RB3. There is a difference there. RB3, as we saw last year with Javante Blue, needs to have special teams value. Otherwise, he's probably going to be an active on game day. Now maybe you can swing as RB2 and Malik Davis would have special teams value, but we just did that with Javante Blue, right? Nick Chubb hasn't played on his team since 2018. So for what Nick Chubb is, at this point in his career specifically for the Cowboys, I think