County of Somerset, PA v. A.F. DeLuca, Somerset County Treasurer
── County of Somerset, PA v. A.F. DeLuca, Somerset County Treasurer ──
Court: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Date: May 12, 2026
Author: Wojcik. Fizzano Cannon
Category: General
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
County of Somerset, Pennsylvania :
by and through its Board of :
Commissioners, Commissioner :
Gerald Walker, Commissioner :
Colleen R. Dawson, and :
Commissioner Pamela A. Tokar-Ickes :
:
v. : No. 336 C.D. 2023
: Argued: November 5, 2025
Anthony F. DeLuca, :
Somerset County Treasurer, :
:
Appellant :
BEFORE: HONORABLE RENÉE COHN JUBELIRER, President Judge
HONORABLE PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge
HONORABLE ANNE E. COVEY, Judge
HONORABLE MICHAEL H. WOJCIK, Judge
HONORABLE CHRISTINE FIZZANO CANNON, Judge
HONORABLE LORI A. DUMAS, Judge
HONORABLE MATTHEW S. WOLF, Judge
OPINION NOT REPORTED
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BY JUDGE WOJCIK FILED: May 12, 2026
Anthony F. DeLuca, Somerset County Treasurer (Treasurer), appeals
the per curiam order of a three-judge panel of the Somerset County Court of
Common Pleas (County and trial court, respectively) denying his post-trial motions1
1
“[A] trial court’s order at the conclusion of a trial, whether the action is one at law or in
equity, cannot become final for purposes of filing an appeal until the court decides any timely post-
trial motions or they are denied by operation of law [under] Pa.R.Civ.P. 227.4(b).” Triple Crown
Corporation, Inc. v. Lower Allen Township, 327 A.3d 748, 754 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2024) (citation
omitted).
following trial on his and the County’s crossclaim for declaratory and injunctive
relief, and entering judgment in favor of the County and against the Treasurer
regarding the disposition of investment funds pursuant to the relevant provisions of
The County Code2 and the Second Class County Code (SCCC).3 We affirm.
The facts in this case are undisputed. This matter involves a dispute
between the County’s Board of Commissioners (Commissioners) and Treasurer4
2
Formerly, The County Code, Act of August 9, 1955, P.L. 323, as amended, 16 P.S. §§101-
3000.3903. The County Code was repealed by Section 5(2) of the Act of May 8, 2024, P.L. 50,
No. 14, effective July 8, 2024 (Act 14), which incorporated the freestanding County Code
provisions into Title 16 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes. A similar act is now found in
The County Code at 16 Pa. C.S. §§101-17509. Indeed, as our Supreme Court has explained:
Act 14 incorporated the freestanding County Code into Title 16 of
the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes. To effectuate those
changes the General Assembly repealed [T]he County Code in its
entirety . . . . However, aside from a few substantive changes not
relevant here, Act 14 was generally intended to affect a
“continuation” of [T]he County Code, despite its repeal. See id. at
§6; id. at §(6)(1) (“Except as otherwise provided in 16 Pa. C.S. Pts.
I, II, III and IV, all activities initiated under [T]he County Code shall
continue and remain in full force and effect and may be completed
under 16 Pa. C.S. Pt. I, II, III, or IV.”); id. at §6(2) (“Except as
provided in paragraph (3), any difference in language between 16
Pa. C.S. Pts. I, II, III and IV and [T]he County Code is intended only
to conform to the style of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes
and is not intended to change or affect the legislat
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}